US sanctions International Criminal Court in major escalation against institution

You will only prosecutes Netanyahu in your dreams. Can you imagine, south Africa brought allegations against Israel and Bibi, then South African was made the judge of the ICC to judge Bibi, south Africa was the complainant and also the judge in the case, very funny

The US under the republicans is bullying the international system in general while acknowledging it is the backbone of it. <br>Far from the statement for political consumption .. I think the proper position of the ICC is stating it works with the countries to have a consensus on a functional rule-based international order and laws. Setting redlines which crossing can threaten the international order. <br><br>Consensus is a key word here .. when historically speaking, when international parties fail to achieve a consensus over any point, power remain the final consensus they subscribe to. Then the negotiations become on how power is used in ways that minimize the mutual harm for the parties..<br>I think this discussion is clear to the American administration when handling tough files like Russia, Iran or North Korea. What the Americans want to say &quot;Suppose any of these thug state commit major crimes, can any international court alone draw lines of accountability by making orders?&quot; <br>The answer is what can be seen in the repeated failure of the security council in issuing resolution due to the veto system. Where Russia and China team as part and US, UK and France team as the other. When the diplomacy fail, the consensus become of who can establish impact on the ground. <br><br>I think the constructive dialogue between the ICC and US Administration is &quot;What are the conditions that the United States consider as necessary for an international tribunal to functionally involve in enforcing rules that stabilizes the international order?&quot;. Which is strategic an interests for the United States as well. And before that &quot;What is the US vision on rule-based international order?&quot;. <br>The ICC with the UN a host to develop consensus of countries about that (including the non-members of the ICC). I think that can be more productive than mere having a stand off.

George W. Bush ordered Nigeria, in 2006, to hand over former Liberian president, Charles Taylor, over to the ICC to face prosecution for alleged war crimes he was accused of committing in Sierra Leone. Taylor was found guilty and is now serving a 50-year sentence in a British prison. Twenty years later, the same US is sanctioning that court because it charged Netanyahu for committing similar crimes. Now, tell me that&#39;s not a double standard.

As a Canadian I want the International Criminal Court to prosecute and punish ALL Canadian war criminals. As a human being I want ALL war criminals, including Americans, to be prosecuted and punished. It’s especially important that Americans are prosecuted because the US government has canceled the Geneva Conventions and the US Code of Military Justice and there’s no other institution to get justice for the victims of American war crimes.

The ICC has always been a joke. Go after the countries who’s own leadership is killing their own people first, like Iran, alike China first, THEN worry about the U.S. and Israel killing others. He who doesn’t respect death enough to kill their own people is a much bigger threat to the world

How does an ICC judge attenpting to prosecute Satan, get barred from use of electronic monetary systems..?<br><br>Shows whos runnin th corrupt monetary system... With Blackrock in money, Amazon/ Meta etc in media... Any1 got info on th religious land owners..?! KEKW