26.6K views
1mo ago
Ross Harrison, senior fellow at the Middle East Institute and author of Decoding Iran's Foreign Policy, says Iran likely expected President Donald Trump to reject its seven-day proposal, since it largely repackages the framework agreed by Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron in a June memorandum of understanding that Washington later tried to undermine.
Harrison says Iran's goal was less about winning US approval than showing its own public, and the American public, a willingness to negotiate. He sees a possible concession in language suggesting the Strait of Hormuz could reopen without ships needing to coordinate with Tehran, a key sticking point that helped collapse the original deal, but says Iran is also working to secure a post-war toll structure with Gulf Arab states.
The US, Harrison says, believes it got a bad deal in June and is betting economic pressure will pay off given time, with Trump's aides reportedly signalling a status quo until after the US midterm elections, followed possibly by military action against Iran.
Subscribe to our channel: http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/AJEnglish
Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera
Check our website: http://www.aljazeera.com/
Check out our Instagram page: https://www.instagram.com/aljazeeraenglish/
Download AJE Mobile App: https://aje.io/AJEMobile
#Iran #US #StraitOfHormuz #RossHarrison #MiddleEast #AlJazeeraEnglish
<br>
<br>At some point, I think he realised that when countries are at war, they often don’t hold elections. Look at the United Kingdom during World War II, for example, or Ukraine today. Ukraine hasn’t held elections, and Zelenskyy has remained in office. That is actually quite normal under wartime conditions.
<br>
<br>So I think Trump may try to use the same logic. Just before the midterm elections, I wouldn’t be surprised if he declared a state of emergency in the United States as a way of avoiding the elections.
<br>
<br>It practically writes itself. In fact, I think it’s inevitable that he’ll do it.
<br>An Operational, Legal, and Chronological Systems Briefing
<br>1. The Core Legal Friction & Sovereignty Lease
<br>The breakdown of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed on June 17, 2026,
<br>stems from a structural mismatch between political expectations and rigid naval realities rather than
<br>unprovoked state aggression. Under Article 5, Iran was granted 100% operational responsibility to clear
<br>hazardous naval minefields from coast to coast within a strict 30-day window, while simultaneously
<br>mandating that commercial shipping continue through a narrow 21-mile bottleneck.
<br>• The Sonar Blindness Paradox: Acoustic demining operations require pristine underwater
<br>acoustic environments. The massive engine cavitation and propeller noise generated by transiting
<br>commercial supertankers effectively blinds sonar arrays. This renders physical minesweeping
<br>impossible while active maritime traffic is parallel to the sweeps.
<br>• The Sovereignty Lease: To fulfill this shore-to-shore sweep safely, Oman had to temporarily
<br>cede operational administration of its territorial waters to Iran for that 30-day block, creating an
<br>exclusive operational sector.<br><br>2. Tactical Corridors & The Mechanism of Sabotage
<br>To reconcile these conflicting needs, Iran established a 100% verified safety corridor hugging its
<br>northern coast via a chain of domestic islands (Qeshm, Larak, and the Tunbs). Global trade was meant
<br>to safely route through this channel while naval teams cleared the remainder of the strait.
<br>• The Unilateral Route Alteration: Fearing Iranian leverage over Western assets, the Trump
<br>administration bypassed the island corridor, establishing an unauthorized southern transit route
<br>directly through the uncleared Omani waters.
<br>• The AIS Transponder Blackout: Washington instructed commercial vessels to turn off their
<br>Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) to evade Iranian tracking, inadvertently steering
<br>blacked-out civilian supertankers directly into floating, unanchored defensive mines.
<br>• Mediator Alignment: Trusted regional mediators (Oman and Qatar) breached neutrality by
<br>covertly coordinating this alternative corridor, granting transit rights they had legally leased to
<br>Iranian administrative control. When accidents occurred, the U.S. and its partners weaponized the
<br>resulting chaos as a legal pretext to freeze the $300B Reconstruction Fund and declare the MoU
<br>dead.<br><br>3. Chronological Mechanics: The 7-Day Standing Ultimatum
<br>By looking past media narratives to the structural timeline of the treaty, the current deadlock reveals a
<br>brilliant legal strategy engineered by Tehran. The original framework was executed successfully for<br>roughly 22 days (June 17 to July 8) before the U.S. declared it terminated. Because Stage 1 was
<br>disrupted, the broader 60-day final treaty negotiations were never activated.
<br>Iran's current 7-day fast-track proposal functions as a strict mathematical and legal 'plug-and-play' reset
<br>button:
<br>• Timeline Synchronization: The 7-day offer represents the exact remaining balance of the initial
<br>30-day implementation stage (22 days completed + 7 days reset balance = 29/30 days).
<br>• Phase 1 (Days 1–5): The U.S. stops its naval blockade, permits Iranian oil exports, and
<br>unfreezes $12B in immediate assets to repair the balance broken by the July sabotage.
<br>• Phase 2 (Days 6–7): Iran finishes the demining sweeps and officially reopens the entire Strait of
<br>Hormuz to normal global traffic.
<br>• The Sequence Trigger: Completion of this 7-day reset immediately fulfills Stage 1, triggering the
<br>automatic activation of the original 60-day diplomatic window to negotiate a permanent regional
<br>treaty.
<br><br>4. The Ultimate Legal High Ground
<br>By keeping this 7-day offer static and anchored strictly to the unaltered text of the June agreement, Iran
<br>has established an unshakeable legal defense. They maintain that Iran has never broken a single
<br>promise; rather, Washington attempted to rewrite the contract on the water. This static ultimatum
<br>isolates the U.S. diplomatically, splits the Western coalition, and leaves Trump with a stark binary
<br>choice: return entirely to the original text he already signed, or absorb a costly, endless war of naval
<br>attrition against stockpiled precision munition shortages.