California county warns they CAN'T VERIFY voter citizenship: 'Stunning admission'

Part 1 of 4 <i>Top Trump adviser: Republicans have &#39;always&#39; relied on voter suppression</i> December 21, 2019 This news article is from <i>The Guardian.</i> <b>”Traditionally, it’s always been Republicans suppressing votes.”</b> One of Donald Trump’s top re-election advisers told influential Republicans in swing state Wisconsin that the party has “traditionally” relied on voter suppression to compete in battleground states, according to an audio recording of a private event. The adviser said later that his remarks referred to frequent and false accusations that Republicans employ such tactics.

2 of 4 <i>Republicans &#39;always&#39; voter suppression</i> But the report emerged just days after news that a conservative group is forcing Wisconsin to purge upwards of 230,000 people from state voter rolls more than a year earlier than planned, <b>a move that would disproportionately affect Democrats before the 2020 election.</b> Just as they did in Florida which gave the election to Bush.

3 of 4 <i>Always&#39; relied on voter suppression</i> And it came as the latest fund-raising totals showed that the Republican National Committee, spurred by aggressive anti-impeachment fundraising, heads into 2020 with more than seven times as much cash on hand as the <i>Democratic National Committee</i> – $63m for the RNC against $8.3m for the DNC, according to FEC filings, Axios reported.

Part 4 of 4 <i>Republicans have &#39;always&#39; relied on voter suppression</i> Justin Clark, a senior political adviser and senior counsel to Trump’s re-election campaign, made the remarks about voter suppression on 21 November as part of a wide-ranging discussion about strategies in the 2020 campaign, including more aggressive use of monitoring of polling places on election day in November 2020.

<b>Paragraph one of five.</b> <i>Biden&#39;s Economic Performance Has Proved Unbeatable</i> December 20, 2021 This news article is from <i>Bloomberg.</i> No first-year president going back to Carter comes close to matching the current White House occupant’s No. 1 or No. 2 ranking in each of 10 key measures. U.S. financial markets are outperforming the world by the biggest margin in the 21st century, and with good reason: America’s economy improved more in Joe Biden&#39;s first 12 months than any president during the past 50 years notwithstanding the contrary media narrative contributing to dour public opinion.

<b>Paragraph 2 of 5.</b> <i>Biden&#39;s Economic Performance</i> Exceptional returns from dollar-denominated assets, especially the S&amp;P 500 Index in both absolute terms and relative to its global counterparts, can be attributed to record-low debt ratios enabling companies to reap the biggest profit margins since 1950. Corporate America is booming because the Biden administration&#39;s Covid-19 vaccination programs and $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan reduced the jobless rate to 4.2% in November from 6.2% in February, continuing an unprecedented rate of decline during the Covid-19 pandemic.

<b>Paragraph 3 of 5.</b> <i>Economic Performance Unbeatable</i> Consider that real, or inflation adjusted, gross domestic product surged at an average annual rate of 5.03% in each of the first three quarters of 2021, and is poised to expand 5.6% for the year based on the average estimate of more than 80 economists surveyed Bloomberg. If that forecast proves accurate, it would be more than 2.8 times the average between 2000 and 2019 and double the average since 1976. All of which makes Biden&#39;s first year in the White House the standout among the seven previous presidents, based on 10 market and economic indicators given equal weight.

<b>Paragraph 4 of 5.</b> <i>Has Proved Unbeatable</i> According to data compiled by Bloomberg, no one comes close to matching Biden&#39;s combination of No. 1 and No. 2 rankings for each of the measures: Gross domestic product (1) Profit growth (1) S&amp;P 500 performance (2) Consumer credit (1) Non-farm payrolls (2) Manufacturing jobs (2) Business productivity (2) Dollar appreciation (2) S&amp;P 500 relative performance (2) Per capita disposable income, which rose 1.08% this year, is the only comparable weakness for Biden, trailing Donald Trump’s 2.17%, George W. Bush’s 2.01%, Jimmy Carter’s 1.80% and Ronald Reagan’s 1.42%.

<b>Paragraph 5 of 5.</b> <i>Biden&#39;s Performance Unbeatable</i> GDP growth in every incoming administration during the past four decades never exceeded 2.74% until 2021. Biden is now positioned to surpass Carter (5.01%) as the GDP champion of presidents since 1976. <b>Much of the credit goes to The </b><b><i>American Rescue Plan,</i></b><b> which poured $66 billion into 36 million households and reduced the child poverty rate by 50%,</b> helping the U.S. recover faster from the pandemic than most other nations.

<b>Paragraph 1 of 2</b> <i>Twice as many companies paying zero taxes under Trump tax plan</i> April 11, 2019 This news article is from <i>NBC News.</i> Under the new law, a company&#39;s income is only taxed in the country in which it is earned. The U.S. no longer taxes new foreign profits unless they reach a certain threshold, at which point the income is taxed at 10.5 percent, half that of the U.S. effective rate. Take for example the giant technology hardware and services company IBM Corp., which consistently ranks among the biggest U.S. companies. The company had revenues of $79.6 billion, more than 60 percent of which came from outside the United States. To that end, IBM made a $2 billion tax payment on future foreign profits in 2018, according to its financial filings. Tax advisor Willens noted IBM elected to make the $2 billion tax payment on future overseas earnings in 2018 instead of down the road in the period it occurs as many companies will do. Meantime, in the United States, IBM reported getting a federal refund of $342 million on its U.S. income before taxes of $500 million, according to ITEP and the company&#39;s annual filing. That computes to an effective U.S. tax rate of negative 68 percent. Its worldwide profits were $8.7 billion – and its total tax provision was $2.6 billion including the foreign tax payment. IBM did not return requests for comment. On a January conference call with investors, IBM Chief Financial Officer Jim Kavanaugh said it anticipated &quot;an all-in rate of at least 11 percent to 12 percent&quot; in 2019, but he did not elaborate. Certain tax rules did not change under the 2017 law, such as the ability of companies to offset taxes with business losses from previous years. Prior to filing for bankruptcy in September 2005, Delta Airlines compiled massive losses that it carries forward, allowing the company to forego paying taxes for years. At the end of 2010, Delta had $17.1 billion of federal pre-tax net losses, according to its financial filing; those offsets have dwindled over the years. ITEP states that Delta also was among the companies that used accelerated depreciation of property to &quot;dramatically reduce their tax rates.&quot; Delta had a rebate of $187 million on $5 billion in U.S. income before federal taxes. Delta did not respond to requests for comment. Delta&#39;s tax-free days may be coming to an end — soon. In a conference call with investors in December, Delta Chief Financial Officer Paul Jacobson acknowledged that the company may pay &quot;cash taxes&quot; as early as next year. Jacobson told investors the new tax law will save the company $800 million a year at its current earnings level. Will the 21 percent corporate rate help Delta? No — because the company doesn&#39;t need it. Jacobson estimates the company&#39;s cash tax rate will be much lower: between 10 to 13 percent.

<b>Paragraph 2 of 2</b> <i>Twice as many companies paying zero taxes</i> <b><i>The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act</i></b><b> lowered the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. In its first year, the number of companies paying no taxes went from 30 to 60.</b> Today&#39;s ITEP report is partly a follow-up to a multi-year analysis of profitable U.S. corporations that showed many paid zero taxes. The institute reviewed the financial filings of more than 600 corporations ranked on the Fortune 500 list between the years 2008 and 2015. On average, about 30 companies each year reported zero U.S. taxes or less. ITEP identified more than twice as many companies claiming they owed no U.S. taxes in 2018. One new significant provision expanded companies&#39; ability to write off certain investments in equipment and factories as well as intellectual property, allowing a full expensing or a 100 percent write off immediately. The rule is in effect until 2022, but gradually phases out by the end of 2026. Jeffrey Hoopes, an accounting professor at the Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said the government typically provides such tax breaks during an economic recession &quot;to get companies to invest more&quot; — not when the &quot;economy is doing well.&quot; The U.S. economy grew 2.9 percent in 2018, as fast as or faster than any year since 2005. Amazon reduced its tax bill partly through accelerated depreciation deductions primarily on equipment, according to its federal filing. In addition, Amazon stated that it has tax benefits related to excess stock-based compensation. ITEP found that Amazon reduced its tax bill by $1 billion through deductions for expenses related to stock-based compensation, one common means for reducing tax bills. The Seattle-based retail and technology behemoth reported a federal tax rebate of $129 million on $10.8 billion in U.S. income before taxes. An Amazon spokesman said the company &quot;pays all the taxes we are required to pay in the U.S. and every country where we operate.&quot; The spokesman said Amazon has paid $2.6 billion in taxes over the last three years but declined to specify whether those taxes were paid in the U.S. or overseas. Pharmaceutical and technology companies have long been criticized for leaving profits overseas in countries with little or no corporate taxes, or tax havens like the Cayman Islands, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. The 2017 tax law looked to address those issues by changing the way the profits from foreign subsidiaries are taxed in the United States. As part of the shift to a new tax regime, U.S. corporations were assessed a one-time tax on foreign profits; the tax can be paid over eight years. A number of companies accounted for the foreign profits payment in 2017 and 2018, resulting in significant tax bills.

<b>Paragraph 1 of 4.</b> <i>Twice as many companies paying zero taxes under Trump tax plan</i> <b><i>The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act</i></b><b> lowered the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. In its first year, the number of companies paying no taxes went from 30 to 60.</b> April 11, 2019 This news article is from <i>NBC News.</i> Taxpayers are scrambling to make last-minute payments due to the Internal Revenue Service in just four days, but many of the country&#39;s largest publicly-held corporations are doing better: They&#39;ve reported they owe absolutely nothing on the billions of dollars in profits they earned last year. At least 60 companies reported that their 2018 federal tax rates amounted to effectively zero, or even less than zero, on income earned on U.S. operations, according to an analysis released today by the Washington, D.C.-based think tank, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. The number is more than twice as many as ITEP found roughly, per year, on average in an earlier, multi-year analysis before the new tax law went into effect. Among them are household names like technology giant Amazon com Inc. and entertainment streaming service Netflix Inc., in addition to global oil giant Chevron Corp., pharmaceutical manufacturer Eli Lilly and Co., and farming and commercial equipment manufacturer Deere &amp; Co. The identified companies were &quot;able to zero out their federal income taxes on $79 billion in U.S. pretax income,&quot; according to the ITEP report, which was released today. &quot;Instead of paying $16.4 billion in taxes, as the new 21 percent corporate tax rate requires, these companies enjoyed a net corporate tax rebate of $4.3 billion, blowing a $20.7 billion hole in the federal budget last year.&quot; To compile the list, ITEP analyzed the 2018 financial filings of the country&#39;s largest 560 publicly-held companies. The controversial Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed by President Donald Trump in December 2017, lowered the corporate tax rate to 21 percent from 35 percent, among other cuts. That&#39;s partly to blame for giving corporations an easier way out of paying taxes, said Matthew Gardner, an ITEP senior fellow and lead author of the report. The new corporate tax rate &quot;lowers the bar for the amount of tax avoidancedying it takes to get you down to zero,&quot; he said.

<b>Paragraph 2 of 4.</b> <i>Twice as many companies paying zero taxes</i> &quot;The specter of big corporations avoiding all income taxes on billions in profits sends a strong and corrosive signal to Americans: that the tax system is stacked against them, in favor of corporations and the wealthiest Americans,&quot; Gardner wrote in the report. The Moline, Illinois-based Deere, which was started in 1837 by blacksmith John Deere, who made farming plows, reported earning $2.15 billion in U.S. income before taxes. It owed no U.S. taxes in 2018 and reported that it was owed $268 million from the government, after taking into consideration various deductions and credits, according to its annual filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company reported global profits of $2.37 billion. Asked about the rebate, Brian Moens, one longtime Deere employee, was contemplative. &quot;Everyone should pay their fair share whether it is an individual or a corporation,&quot; he said. &quot;If just the small individuals are paying it without large corporations doing their part, I don&#39;t see that being fair.&quot; Moens credits his wife with getting their taxes filed early in February. They anticipated a refund, like in past years, because they overpaid during the year. &quot;It wasn&#39;t quite what Trump had said it was going to be,&quot; said Moens, who assembles farm planting tractors at the Moline factory. &quot;It was less than what we had received in previous years,&quot; although nothing had changed. Deere declined to elaborate on its taxes. Spokesman Ken Golden said, &quot;We do not provide comments beyond what is contained in Deere &amp; Company&#39;s public filings as we believe the public filings provide the necessary information when they are assessed in their entirety.&quot; Trump&#39;s tax cut bill slashed the corporate tax rate and eliminated and tightened certain deductions, while providing other new tax breaks to companies. The cut in the corporate tax rate alone will save corporations $1.35 trillion over the next 10 years, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, which reports to the Senate and House finance and budget committees. The United States theoretically had one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world, though many firms had an effective rate much lower. Previous administrations, including President Barack Obama&#39;s, had sought to modestly cut the corporate tax rate to make it more competitive. After taking office in January 2017, Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress quickly enacted one of the most sweeping tax bills in decades — an overhaul that is estimated to raise the federal deficit to $900 billion this year, and more than $1 trillion, starting in 2022, according to the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan legislative agency. Corporations generally don&#39;t get &quot;refund&quot; checks as individuals do for overpaying. Instead, corporations calculate how much in taxes they owe by rolling up various deductions and tax credits that then lower the tax bill until, in many cases, they owe nothing in taxes or accrue a deficit, referred to as a rebate, that they use to offset taxes in the future. Robert Willens, an independent tax advisor who teaches corporate tax courses at Columbia Business School, said corporations have typically sought to obtain a refund on taxes paid in preceding years when they generated net operating losses in those years. The new tax bill eliminated that ability to carry back those net operating losses, but it allowed companies to carry the losses forward indefinitely, he said. Willens said he expects to see fewer refunds than in the past since net operating losses were the principal source. &quot;However, if a corporation files an amended tax return, because it now decides that it paid too much in taxes in a prior year based on its revised treatment of an item of income or expense, it can certainly get a refund of all or a portion of the taxes paid in the earlier year,&quot; Willens said.

<b>Paragraph 3 of 4.</b> <i>Twice many companies zero taxes Trump tax plan</i> <b><i>The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act</i></b><b> lowered the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent.</b> Studies show that many corporations rarely paid the 35 percent rate under the old tax code. Over the years, companies found many ways to cut their tax bills, from sheltering foreign earnings in low-tax countries and banking credits for money spent on research and development to deducting the expense of stock options for executives. Gardner said the new tax law has left most of the old tax breaks intact while cutting the rate by almost half, resulting in a &quot;continued decline in our already low corporate revenues.&quot; Revenues from the corporate tax fell by 31 percent in 2018 to $204 billion from $297 billion. &quot;This was a more precipitous decline than in any year of normal economic growth in U.S. history,&quot; he wrote. Tax Foundation chief economist Kyle Pomerleau said the U.S. corporate tax law was &quot;in need of reform.&quot; He said the new law reduced the U.S. rate to discourage companies from moving profits to countries with lower tax rates as well as allowing for certain deductions that encourage more immediate investment in factories and equipment. Today&#39;s ITEP report is partly a follow-up to a multi-year analysis of profitable U.S. corporations that showed many paid zero taxes. The institute reviewed the financial filings of more than 600 corporations ranked on the Fortune 500 list between the years 2008 and 2015. On average, about 30 companies each year reported zero U.S. taxes or less. ITEP identified more than twice as many companies claiming they owed no U.S. taxes in 2018. One new significant provision expanded companies&#39; ability to write off certain investments in equipment and factories as well as intellectual property, allowing a full expensing or a 100 percent write off immediately. The rule is in effect until 2022, but gradually phases out by the end of 2026. Jeffrey Hoopes, an accounting professor at the Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said the government typically provides such tax breaks during an economic recession &quot;to get companies to invest more&quot; — not when the &quot;economy is doing well.&quot; The U.S. economy grew 2.9 percent in 2018, as fast as or faster than any year since 2005. Amazon reduced its tax bill partly through accelerated depreciation deductions primarily on equipment, according to its federal filing. In addition, Amazon stated that it has tax benefits related to excess stock-based compensation. ITEP found that Amazon reduced its tax bill by $1 billion through deductions for expenses related to stock-based compensation, one common means for reducing tax bills. The Seattle-based retail and technology behemoth reported a federal tax rebate of $129 million on $10.8 billion in U.S. income before taxes. An Amazon spokesman said the company &quot;pays all the taxes we are required to pay in the U.S. and every country where we operate.&quot; The spokesman said Amazon has paid $2.6 billion in taxes over the last three years but declined to specify whether those taxes were paid in the U.S. or overseas. Pharmaceutical and technology companies have long been criticized for leaving profits overseas in countries with little or no corporate taxes, or tax havens like the Cayman Islands, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. The 2017 tax law looked to address those issues by changing the way the profits from foreign subsidiaries are taxed in the United States. As part of the shift to a new tax regime, U.S. corporations were assessed a one-time tax on foreign profits; the tax can be paid over eight years. A number of companies accounted for the foreign profits payment in 2017 and 2018, resulting in significant tax bills.

<b>Paragraph 4 of 4.</b> <i>Companies paying zero taxes under Trump tax plan</i> <b><i>The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act</i></b><b> lowered the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. In its first year, the number of companies paying no taxes went from 30 to 60.</b> Under the new law, a company&#39;s income is only taxed in the country in which it is earned. The U.S. no longer taxes new foreign profits unless they reach a certain threshold, at which point the income is taxed at 10.5 percent, half that of the U.S. effective rate. Take for example the giant technology hardware and services company IBM Corp., which consistently ranks among the biggest U.S. companies. The company had revenues of $79.6 billion, more than 60 percent of which came from outside the United States. To that end, IBM made a $2 billion tax payment on future foreign profits in 2018, according to its financial filings. Tax advisor Willens noted IBM elected to make the $2 billion tax payment on future overseas earnings in 2018 instead of down the road in the period it occurs as many companies will do. Meantime, in the United States, IBM reported getting a federal refund of $342 million on its U.S. income before taxes of $500 million, according to ITEP and the company&#39;s annual filing. That computes to an effective U.S. tax rate of negative 68 percent. Its worldwide profits were $8.7 billion – and its total tax provision was $2.6 billion including the foreign tax payment. IBM did not return requests for comment. On a January conference call with investors, IBM Chief Financial Officer Jim Kavanaugh said it anticipated &quot;an all-in rate of at least 11 percent to 12 percent&quot; in 2019, but he did not elaborate. Certain tax rules did not change under the 2017 law, such as the ability of companies to offset taxes with business losses from previous years. Prior to filing for bankruptcy in September 2005, Delta Airlines compiled massive losses that it carries forward, allowing the company to forego paying taxes for years. At the end of 2010, Delta had $17.1 billion of federal pre-tax net losses, according to its financial filing; those offsets have dwindled over the years. ITEP states that Delta also was among the companies that used accelerated depreciation of property to &quot;dramatically reduce their tax rates.&quot; Delta had a rebate of $187 million on $5 billion in U.S. income before federal taxes. Delta did not respond to requests for comment. Delta&#39;s tax-free days may be coming to an end — soon. In a conference call with investors in December, Delta Chief Financial Officer Paul Jacobson acknowledged that the company may pay &quot;cash taxes&quot; as early as next year. Jacobson told investors the new tax law will save the company $800 million a year at its current earnings level. Will the 21 percent corporate rate help Delta? No — because the company doesn&#39;t need it. Jacobson estimates the company&#39;s cash tax rate will be much lower: between 10 to 13 percent.

A DOJ list sent to Nevada flagging nearly 16,000 &quot;likely noncitizens&quot; was reviewed by state officials and found to consist entirely of eligible U.S. citizens. <br>This is just a common republican vote-spoiling attack that has been done state-wide in red states for many years.<br>Basically, someone with a common Hispanic name dies or is found not to be a citizen, so republicans remove everyone with that common name.

<b>Meanwhile multiple reports from voters and poll workers are coming in about voting machines in Tennessee automatically changing the vote to the Republican candidate multiple times after people have selected the Democratic candidate. Why aren&#39;t Faux News reporting on that?!</b>

The list from the DOJ can not be trusted as accurate.<br>The list—containing roughly 20,000 names sent by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to California election officials on a password-protected thumb drive—has major reliability and procedural issues.<br>A spot check of some names found them to be native-born citizens.

The California Motor Voter program automatically registers people to vote, and CA automatically sends out ballets to all registered voters. <br>This does not mean anyone that accidentally gets a ballet is going to risk jail time to vote.<br>Also, the republican party is infamous for their ballet-spoiling by doing things like a guy named Hose Sanchez dies, so everyone with that common name has their name marked invalid.

It is incredible that California is unable to do what is done in every other modern, civilized country: make it clear to all voters that they must unequivocally identify themselves using an official form of identification that includes their legal place of residence and a photograph of their face.

Fox, I fixed the title for you: Los Angeles County and California election officials stated in court filings that the county registrar does not possess the records, equipment, or legal authority to independently verify voter citizenship. <br><br>Local registrars are county or state clerks, not federal immigration officials. They do not independently house or maintain citizenship records.🤷🇺🇸

I come from one of the most poorest countries in the world but one thing, if you are not a citizen you can’t even try to vote cause you will go to jail with hard labor then deported. <br><br>I just don’t know how America allows states to do this. Still just so hard to believe and there is talking and talking and talking in the media with nothing happening.

Weird: not a word on fox entertainment network about yet another discovery of corruption from trump. He got his pet lawyer, haba, hired for 50 million dollars by some guy who had already admitted he was guilty, and - surprise, surprise - a few days later the guilty guy gets a pardon from trump. But sure, since it&#39;s on every regular news outlet in the usa and others around the world but not on fox, it must be &quot;fake news&quot;, right? Just like how fox couldn&#39;t be bothered by the previous case of corruption by don jr.s ex girlfriend? It happened, but it didn&#39;t really happen, right, fox viewer?

We all know that Donald Trump is going to turn the midterms into the....<br><br> GANGS OF NEW YORK ... <br><br>Trump wants to be Bill the Butcher (Daniel Day-Lewis)...<br><br>......take his opponents out with a meat clever to the back... <br><br>....and storm the voting places with his gang members...

Folks .... come on .... it could not be more clear that Trump absolutely is the wrong guy to be given total and complete freedom to do what ever he wants to do with our Country ,,,,, and the GOP Senators do absolutely nothing ..... there are no &quot;checks and balances &quot; in the Government .... Trump threatened Canadians that they must give up their nation or face economic ruin ,,,,,, he imposed insane tariffs that immedialty doubled the cost of many items ,,,then he flip flopped on the tariffs to the point that nobody even knew what the new trade laws were ,,, he started a war that tripled diesel prices without providing us even the teeny tiniest peace of proof ,,,,, he then flip flopped at least twenty times on what was going to happen next in the war ..... in his vanity he decided that everything should be re named after him including the Kennedy Center ,,,,, he tore apart the white house that belonged to all of us - so it could become his Mar-Lago II ....... he renamed a great lake and the gulf without asking any of us if we liked the idea or not ..... he threatened Denmark over their territory to the point that they laid down explosives on the Greenland airports out of fear of a US attack ,,,, he never came thru with even the most basic outline of a plan for the American medical system - after promising that it was one of his top priorities , he took away a Women&#39;s rights to their own bodies - forcing them you drive across the country to the blue states ..... he befriended Dictator Putin and literally rolled out the red carpet for him while at the same time providing weapons to be used against him ,,,,, and just in general acted like a fool the past 2 years .

THE EPSTEIN LIST <br><br>ADAM SANDLER<br>AL GORE<br>ALAN DERSHOWITZ<br>ALEC BALDWIN<br>ANDERSON COOPER<br>ANGELINA JOLIE<br>BARACK OBAMA<br>MICHELLE OBAMA<br>BEN AFFLECK<br>BERNIE SANDERS<br>BEYONCE KNOWLES<br>BILL CLINTON<br>HILARY CLINTON<br>BOB SAGAT<br>BILL GATES <br>BILL MURRAY<br>BRUCE WILLIS <br>CHARLIE SHEEN <br>CELINE DION<br>CHARLES BARKLEY <br>CHER<br>CHARLIZE THERON <br>CHRIS TUCKER<br>COURTNEY COX<br>COURTNEY LOVE<br>DONALD TRUMP<br>DEMI MOORE <br>DAVID SPADE<br>DREW BARRYMORE<br>ELON MUSK<br>ELLEN DEGENERES<br>GEORGE CLOONEY<br>GWEN STEFANI<br>HEIDI KLUM<br>JAMES FRANCO<br>JENNIFER ANISTON<br>JIM CARREY<br>JIMMY KIMMEL<br>JOE BIDEN<br>JOHN CUSACK<br>JOHN LEGEND<br>JOHN TRAVOLTA<br>JOY BEHAR<br>JUSTIN TRUDEAU<br>SOPHIE TRUDEAU<br>KATY PERRY <br>KATHY GRIFFIN<br>KEVIN SPACEY<br>LADY GAGA<br>MADONNA<br>MARK EPSTEIN<br>MERYL STREEP<br>MILEY CYRUS<br>OPRAH WINFREY<br>ORLANDO BLOOM<br>PARIS HILTON<br>PAULA EPSTEIN <br>PRINCE ANDREW<br>PRINCE CHARLES<br>QUENTIN TARANTINO<br>RACHEL MADDOW<br>ROBERT DENIRO <br>ROBERT DOWNEY JR<br>RIHANNA<br>ROB REINER<br>SARAH SILVERMAN<br>STEVEN SPIELBERG<br>STEVEN TYLER<br>STEVEN COLBERT<br>SETH GREEN<br>TOM HANKS<br>WILL FERRELL<br>WHOOPI GOLDBERG<br>WANDA SYKES<br><br><br>🇮🇱🌈<br><br>Trump is