We use cookies to improve your experience on VidNexa. We use necessary cookies to keep you signed in and keep the site secure, and — only with your permission — preference cookies (seen videos, recent categories), analytics cookies (a first-party visitor id and A/B assignment, first-party measurement, and Google Analytics), and marketing cookies (only when a third-party ad tag or slot is enabled).
Learn more about our privacy policy
Choose which non-essential cookies VidNexa may use. Necessary cookies are always on: they keep you signed in, protect forms, and keep the site secure.
Global Privacy Control: your browser is sending a GPC signal, so Analytics and Marketing stay off while it is on — even if you previously accepted them.
NecessarySession, feed security nonce, admin sign-in persistence. Always on.
PreferencesSeen-video list, recent categories, row preferences. Remember what you watched and browsed.
AnalyticsGoogle Analytics (GA4), run by Google, to measure traffic — it loads only if you allow this category — plus a first-party visitor id, A/B assignment and first-party viewing measurement used to test feed changes. Turning this off also deletes Google Analytics cookies already set.
MarketingThird-party ad tags and slots, only when an admin enables them. No marketing cookie is set by default.
Get the VidNexa apps
VidNexa on every screen — free for Android, Windows & Mac.
Most interesting parts in this vid: 0:00 Hook 0:36 Intro: LBC vs GenderGP 1:15 Round 1: Can an 11-year-old consent? 10:36 Commentary: She sent him to WPATH 11:2…
Most interesting parts in this vid:
0:00 Hook
0:36 Intro: LBC vs GenderGP
1:15 Round 1: Can an 11-year-old consent?
10:36 Commentary: She sent him to WPATH
11:27 Round 2: The Cass Review
15:10 Commentary: Name one flaw
15:53 Round 3: The case of Child J
18:49 Final thoughts: Where’s the evidence?
⚠️ No Copyright Intended | Original Content By @LBCOfficial | All Rights Reserved To Their Respective Owners
...more
11 Comments
@@msorsky1Imported2wk ago
The analogy with the broken arm leaves out the fact that when we treat a broken arm, we are taking something broken and trying to bring it back to normal... When we "treat" gender dysphoria, we are taking something normal and trying to break it....
@@RinaTrauernicht-xf4ifImported2wk ago
Wat weet n kind van eif jaar.? Tieners se hormone is so deurmekaar. Dit is nie die mens se reg om in te meng, om God te speel nie. Daar is so baie deurmekaar kinders vandag en dit is alles die volwassenes se skuld. Daar word allerande onwaarhede in hulle kop gesit. Kinders vertrou volassenes, veral as dit hulle Ouers is. Die kinders is nie die probleem. Die probleem lê by volwassenes wat self die pad byster geraak het. Dit grens aan Waansin wat in die Wêreld aangaan.
@@jfoss1974Imported2wk ago
Every interview I’ve seen of this woman is scary. She’s evil. 💯
@@sovereigngodlisaloves9525Imported3wk ago
I'm not enamoured of the "This has never happened before" aspect of the thumbnail titles, or that this one "SLAUGHTERED" the other one, in all caps. It's like every single video intro is some extraordinary essence of click bait. I would say that over the course of 2 months, this might be my 8th time viewing. The last time a commenter was annoyed with kind of a similar complaint and was about to unsubscribe. If this presentation approach got to where you are, go further. But that's my opinion on it.
@@LauraFenton-y9rImported3wk ago
This “doctor” is completely evil and most definitely be struck off, if it hasn’t already been done
@@adriananderson9783Imported3wk ago
"It looked at hundreds of studies and graded them based on which ones said what they agreed with and rejected the ones that didn't agree with them."
@@drewnagy5234Imported3wk ago
Blame everyone that doesn't agree with you being guilty of Exactly what You Are Guilty For!
@@drewnagy5234Imported3wk ago
"I can't answer Any questions because You are a Cherry Picker!" What a Double Standard Hypocrisy...
@@marshall1982Imported3wk ago
She’s lying and knows it! They’re not just leaked files, WPATH clinicians are on video discussing it.
@@FranktheDachshund-e6iImported3wk ago
If a child goes through puberty while using puberty blockers, by definition their body has had development blocked. Then at age 22 they decide that transitioning was a mistake and stop taking the blockers, the development that their body did not go through is not going to come back. Her constant attempts to be snippy and clever are not helping her argument.
0:00 Hook
0:36 Intro: LBC vs GenderGP
1:15 Round 1: Can an 11-year-old consent?
10:36 Commentary: She sent him to WPATH
11:27 Round 2: The Cass Review
15:10 Commentary: Name one flaw
15:53 Round 3: The case of Child J
18:49 Final thoughts: Where’s the evidence?
⚠️ No Copyright Intended | Original Content By @LBCOfficial | All Rights Reserved To Their Respective Owners
Share
Nobody Has Ever DISMANTLED The Puberty Blocker Argument On LIVE Radio Like Tom Swarbrick Did
Ibrahim Onyema • 1K views
Share via
Or copy link
Embed
Report video
Reporting your own copyrighted work? Rights holders: please use the DMCA takedown form — it goes straight to our copyright agent.
Send a thanks
Support the creator with a one-time donation.
Choose an amount — you'll continue to secure checkout to complete your Thanks.
Create clip
Start 0:00
End 1:00
Length 60s(max 60 seconds)
auto_awesomeAsk about this video
Searching videos — tap the search icon again to chat