Could Russia’s Kaliningrad threats trigger a nuclear crisis with NATO? | DW News - VidNexa Skip to main content
VidNexa
VidNexa
GET IT ONGoogle Play
Register
VidNexa
Up next
 
00:00 / 00:00
QualityAutochevron_right
Playback speedchevron_right
Audio trackchevron_right
Chapterschevron_right
Autoplay On
Loop Off
Sticky player Off
Sleep timerOffchevron_right
Subtitles/CC On
Captionschevron_right
Keyboard shortcuts ?
Stats for nerds
Sleep timer ended
⏪ 10s
⏩ 10s

Could Russia’s Kaliningrad threats trigger a nuclear crisis with NATO? | DW News

3.4K views • 1mo ago
Watch Party
52 Comments
@tages_matuna
@@tages_matunaImported1mo ago
NATO must train to isolate and take Königsberg back to Europe 🇪🇺
@williammassey532
@@williammassey532Imported1mo ago
General Donahue just made commentary on how easily they could take Kaliningrad. Along with the exercises.....who would've thought Russia needed to state its position 😅😅😅
@Icpcryptoiambuying
@@IcpcryptoiambuyingImported1mo ago
This is Nick named the slow war it’s so slow it sucks kaliningrad should have been taken years ago the tyrant will just scream and shout nothing more
@TourGuideFromTheUnderworld
@@TourGuideFromTheUnderworldImported1mo ago
Ok so if putin attacks nato we will use nukes, one more drone we nuke them
@matse2627
@@matse2627Imported1mo ago
If the western allies act like russia does, NATO should declare Kaliningrad as temporary Ukrainian territory, as pawn for what the aggressor has occupied since 2014.
@mahiletTesfaye-xi7yo
@@mahiletTesfaye-xi7yoImported1mo ago
Your obsession with 🇷🇺 is absolutely hilarious 😁😁
@jabadabadu7089
@@jabadabadu7089Imported1mo ago
Is Putin aware that EU also have nuclear weapons and that we can also destroy and poison Russia and us at the same time?
<br>Does he even realize that using nukes will render Europe uninhabitable for anyone, including Russians?
@ore1263
@@ore1263Imported1mo ago
Won&#39;t play along? Good, go attack them, stop with pointless news.
@michaelwilson9921
@@michaelwilson9921Imported1mo ago
Nothing new. Mutual Assured Destruction has been the official party of all sides since the Cold War.
@Alexandra-bc3ol
@@Alexandra-bc3olImported1mo ago
Right thus of Russia.
@perth-quokka
@@perth-quokkaImported1mo ago
so called Kaliningrad was never historically Russian - it was claimed by the Soviets after WW2 and kept by Russia after Cold War, when in fact it should have never held that territory
@killeresk
@@killereskImported1mo ago
Those old rockets are so poorly maintained for so long that most would fall back on Russia or not even launch.
@tages_matuna
@@tages_matunaImported1mo ago
😅bring it on old fart! 😅
@Haegemon
@@HaegemonImported1mo ago
He could because he&#39;s an old man and a tyrant, but what else can you do? Bow to him and his delusions and.surrender Berlin, Poland, Estonia, etc back to Russia?
@ClippyOffice97
@@ClippyOffice97Imported1mo ago
Hindsight is 20/20 -- Germany, Lithuania and Poland all had a chance to reintegrate Kaliningrad (Königsberg) into their territories back in 1990.all of them didn&#39;t want it because &quot;too many Russians&quot;, and now the area has become another flash point. The wise man sees the danger well ahead, and takes action to avoid it. This SHOULD have been done over 35 years ago, but here we are ...
@sandwichsurfer
@@sandwichsurferImported1mo ago
well, don&#39;t touch it then
@GeoDaddï
@@GeoDaddïImported1mo ago
if Russia says we shouldn&#39;t do something at this point we should do it. they wouldn&#39;t make a stink out of it if it wasnt vital to there next move which is clearly attacking europe after all those drone attacks at the Munich airport this is the pretense to invade as well which theyll come up another reason for if we dont anyway so we must strike first fast and hard because thats the only way to deal with bullies punch them in the face before they punch us he wants to break europe and we have to make the first big move to show were serious about threats and lies and will take everything away from them till they learn to respect us like the grounded child putin should be
@kwlian2004
@@kwlian2004Imported1mo ago
SUCH BS ; IRGC KEPT RATTLING ABOUT NUCLEAR WEOPAN AS WELL NO 1 SHIAT IN EU CONDMNING THEM AT ALL AS WELL LOLOLOLS .
@atoz09093
@@atoz09093Imported1mo ago
Let&#39;s write a joint EU/NATO letter in response. Putin can recognize the 2013 borders this week and withdraw completely from Urkraine by the end of October. Over the next several months, they can peacefully hand over Kaliningrad to Poland and Lithuania (with income from the ports there to cover rebuilding Ukraine). In exchange, we won&#39;t destroy Russia&#39;s military and fiossil fuel industry.
@tomalmow3814
@@tomalmow3814Imported1mo ago
Who used NUKES before? Now Russia has to go at it as well: Europe get your share!! Berlin could be a good start:)=
@ericaryee9296
@@ericaryee9296Imported1mo ago
What about threats from Poland?
@HiepNguyen-xs2pr
@@HiepNguyen-xs2prImported1mo ago
just think about all EU countries fire missiles to all Russia military targets, oil facilities, stuctures etc is enough to erase Russia
@urldroidsuperbot2139
@@urldroidsuperbot2139Imported1mo ago
Russia loses because it always reacts and that to slowly.<br>This is the first time I heard Russia arming its fleet.<br>This should have been done four years ago.
@wordscapes5690
@@wordscapes5690Imported1mo ago
No one wants Kaliningrad. Unlike Russia, NATO did not reclaim its former colonies once it had let them go.
@dallastaylor5479
@@dallastaylor5479Imported1mo ago
😂 does he think he&#39;s scaring anyone?
@alieutouray4418
@@alieutouray4418Imported1mo ago
😂😂😂you have been seizing Russian cargo ships and now you clearly know that Russian federation is going to retaliate but suddenly you&#39;re concern of escalation I don&#39;t understand you European leaders your are very Reckless or irrational or stupit this is not children games this is a matter of life and dead is very disturbing to people you&#39;re governing
@HiepNguyen-xs2pr
@@HiepNguyen-xs2prImported1mo ago
in modern time, any country which uses nuclear is also destroy itself
@AlmostStoneHeart
@@AlmostStoneHeartImported1mo ago
All of it could be avoided in 2022 if we provided proper help to Ukraine. Ukraine would liberate all its land and putin would be removed from power. Instead we were constantly stalling Ukraine , we were shivering from fear... Now what? Exactly like it is said - if someone chooses dishonor instead of war, he will get both in the end
@firstjayjay
@@firstjayjayImported1mo ago
A wise terminator once said: Its in your nature to destroy yourselves.
@nenadmitrovic3469
@@nenadmitrovic3469Imported1mo ago
Putin said &quot;direct attack&quot; even in this video, while DW and western media always ignore it and claim &quot;isolate it&quot;, multiple times in every video
@Hussain8216
@@Hussain8216Imported1mo ago
God forbid, if a nuclear war startes with NATO, everyone will lose, particularly Europe!!!😭😭😭😭
@patrolmanpete
@@patrolmanpeteImported1mo ago
Blah blah blah.... We&#39;ve heard it all before, Vlad 😂
@i_am_silkbeard
@@i_am_silkbeardImported1mo ago
FAFO 😂
@kurtpleavin
@@kurtpleavinImported1mo ago
Russia issuing nuclear threats? Must be a day ending in &quot;y&quot;
@robijorum4113
@@robijorum4113Imported1mo ago
I mean if NATO thinks it&#39;s a bluff they could go ahead and take Kaliningrad, it&#39;s not like we haven&#39;t heard this before , right?😂 Yeah FAFO
@trqster
@@trqsterImported1mo ago
So if NATO decided to attack Kaliningrad, it triggers a strong response from Russia. What a bummer!
@vcasdfawerqwerasdfar
@@vcasdfawerqwerasdfarImported1mo ago
Just give a bottle of strontium vodka for Putin.
@TNFVLOGS
@@TNFVLOGSImported1mo ago
At some point putin will make good on this threat its just a matter of when
@Shining237
@@Shining237Imported1mo ago
Godspeed Mr.Putin
@maikelh5718
@@maikelh5718Imported1mo ago
In the russian constitution I thought it says only when the government is at threat of topplling over, due to war, that they could resort to a nuke constitutionally. <br><br>So I guess he is just barking like usual. <br><br>The Russian red lines are like the dunes in Saudi Arabia, always shifting.
@TheI3lacky
@@TheI3lackyImported1mo ago
If Russians would want peace and IF they´d have any Integrity or Backbone - they would put a bullet in Putins Head... easy as that.
@alieutouray4418
@@alieutouray4418Imported1mo ago
Putin ❤❤❤ your advice for NATO is excellent otherwise They&#39;ll try something not funny <br>From Russian federation is going to attack us to trying to attack and cut off Kaliningrad when Russian federation response to their provocation hooooohhh people Putin is threatening us again what kind of logic is that very stupit argument by NATO
@ЕвгенийКоролев-ш9р
@@ЕвгенийКоролев-ш9рImported1mo ago
In the West, leaders repeat the same mantra like a spell: “Russia will never use nuclear weapons!” But where does this foolish confidence come from? In Russia, its residents are surprised that nuclear weapons haven’t been used yet and are expecting their use — and not just on the territory of the former Ukraine.
@DavidNelsonATX
@@DavidNelsonATXImported1mo ago
Putin is scared. The threats are a sign of weakness and insecurity. What he’s not afraid of right now is the USA because of the chronically poor leadership of Trump and Hegseth.
@ZabZab-s3i
@@ZabZab-s3iImported1mo ago
Let&#39;s go ask a woman
@Shaun_7926
@@Shaun_7926Imported1mo ago
This old man and his threats all the time
@PROF_51
@@PROF_51Imported1mo ago
He hase right to use nukes
@BaliAgha
@@BaliAghaImported1mo ago
Yawn, Russia is all talk, no bite.
@nerdnalist
@@nerdnalistImported1mo ago
Putin is an impotent coward and we all should assume anything he says is a lie. If he was gonna use nuclear weapons he would have already.
@maciejkowalski7906
@@maciejkowalski7906Imported1mo ago
I hope nuclear war will start atleast 3 months after wow forever release.
@GrandAdmiralThong
@@GrandAdmiralThongImported1mo ago
Dictator blah blah blah blah
@dwnews
@@dwnewsImported1mo ago
Russia says nuclear weapons could be used if NATO tried to isolate Kaliningrad. Putin says a direct attack could put “all types of weapons” on the agenda. If nuclear threats repeatedly make an adversary more cautious, does that make them an effective deterrent, and therefore more likely to be used again? Where should NATO draw the line between avoiding escalation and rewarding nuclear brinkmanship?