'An absurdity' to blame human error: Spain's deadly train crash 'should never' have happened - VidNexa Skip to main content
VidNexa
VidNexa
GET IT ONGoogle Play
Register
VidNexa
Up next
 
00:00 / 00:00
QualityAutochevron_right
Playback speedchevron_right
Audio trackchevron_right
Chapterschevron_right
Autoplay On
Loop Off
Sticky player Off
Sleep timerOffchevron_right
Subtitles/CC On
Captionschevron_right
Keyboard shortcuts ?
Stats for nerds
Sleep timer ended
⏪ 10s
⏩ 10s

'An absurdity' to blame human error: Spain's deadly train crash 'should never' have happened

1.2K views • 4d ago
Watch Party
11 Comments
jaredvaughan1665
@jaredvaughan1665Imported4d ago
Trains should have transponders like planes
mikeleei3b
@mikeleei3bImported4d ago
so there is something called PTC ie... Positive Train Control <br><br> There has never been a documented fatal rail accident caused by a failure or malfunction of an active Positive Train Control (PTC) system.<br><br>While minor software glitches, server dropouts, or communication gaps can force trains to temporarily drop into a slower, manual &quot;fallback mode&quot;, the system is fundamentally built on fail-safe logic—meaning if it loses power or encounters an error, it defaults to stopping or slowing the train safely<br><br>is the loss of 68 folks and millions of dollars or in your case Euros worth finally investing in modern Railway safety Systems???<br><br>This all would have been avoided with PTC in active usage<br><br>Time to come fully into the 21st century folks<br><br>PTC wass mandated by Congress and has been in use in the USA
christopherpage2622
@christopherpage2622Imported4d ago
Nothing about the go ahead message manual override without including the protocol of moving at a reduced speed of 40 mph that if the train was at that speed the driver would have been able to brake and slow down to avoid the collision when he made visual contact? Those safety protocols in the control centre for this situation of moving at a reduced speed are already in place so why was no message to move at reduced speed given to the driver after the manual override? Of course human error or outright negligence of protocols came into play.
jenniferjuniper12
@jenniferjuniper12Imported4d ago
Isn’t it obvious that someone overrode failsafe mechanisms? It’s definitely human error.
howardjohnston8629
@howardjohnston8629Imported4d ago
Possibly the most uninformative expert I’ve ever listened to.
ronbennett7885
@ronbennett7885Imported4d ago
Presuming the company cut corners. Also, driving hiring standards likely lacking. To save money and maybe DEI.
jeffreymorris1752
@jeffreymorris1752Imported4d ago
I keep hearing that this accident was impossible. Nobody&#39;s fault because it was impossible. It will end up being one, two or three people in the control room at fault.
mhht2fp
@mhht2fpImported4d ago
What protocol allowed the control center to override safety measures? Is it the one called &quot;money is time&quot;&quot;?
hermleesully
@hermleesullyImported4d ago
Maybe third world countries shouldn&#39;t be allowed to have high speed rail.
docastrov9013
@docastrov9013Imported4d ago
If the drivers used Waze it wouldn&#39;t have happened.
makedredd299
@makedredd299Imported4d ago
Trains were much safer in the 1800s. 🚂