We use cookies to improve your experience on VidNexa. Learn more
Cookie preferences
We use cookies to improve your experience on VidNexa. We use necessary cookies to keep you signed in and keep the site secure, and — only with your permission — preference cookies (seen videos, recent categories), analytics cookies (a first-party visitor id and A/B assignment, first-party measurement, and Google Analytics), and marketing cookies (only when a third-party ad tag or slot is enabled).
Learn more
Choose which non-essential cookies VidNexa may use. Necessary cookies are always on: they keep you signed in, protect forms, and keep the site secure.
Global Privacy Control: your browser is sending a GPC signal, so Analytics and Marketing stay off while it is on — even if you previously accepted them.
NecessarySession, feed security nonce, admin sign-in persistence. Always on.
PreferencesSeen-video list, recent categories, row preferences. Remember what you watched and browsed.
AnalyticsGoogle Analytics (GA4), run by Google, to measure traffic — it loads only if you allow this category — plus a first-party visitor id, A/B assignment and first-party viewing measurement used to test feed changes. Turning this off also deletes Google Analytics cookies already set.
MarketingThird-party ad tags and slots, only when an admin enables them. No marketing cookie is set by default.
Global brands spend millions tailoring campaigns for local audiences. But sometimes, a single word or symbol can spark a backlash. In recent weeks, two major br…
Global brands spend millions tailoring campaigns for local audiences. But sometimes, a single word or symbol can spark a backlash. In recent weeks, two major brands have learned just how quickly history can shape public reaction. CNA Senior Correspondents Lim Yun Suk and Tan Yew Guan unpack the recent controversies surrounding Starbucks in South Korea and Lululemon in China, and explore why history remains a powerful force shaping consumer perceptions and brand reputations.
Global brands spend millions tailoring campaigns for local audiences. But sometimes, a single word or symbol can spark a backlash. In recent weeks, two major brands have learned just how quickly history can shape public reaction. CNA Senior Correspondents Lim Yun Suk and Tan Yew Guan unpack the recent controversies surrounding Starbucks in South Korea and Lululemon in China, and explore why history remains a powerful force shaping consumer perceptions and brand reputations.
Share
The past isn't past: Why Starbucks and Lululemon face backlash in East Asia
Trang Hoang • 30 views
Share via
Or copy link
Embed
Report video
Reporting your own copyrighted work? Rights holders: please use the DMCA takedown form — it goes straight to our copyright agent.
Send a thanks
Support the creator with a one-time donation.
Choose an amount — you'll continue to secure checkout to complete your Thanks.