Greenland Deal: Greenland: A Trump Win or Danish Masterclass? • FRANCE 24 English - VidNexa Skip to main content
VidNexa
VidNexa
GET IT ONGoogle Play
Register
VidNexa
Up next
 
00:00 / 00:00
QualityAutochevron_right
Playback speedchevron_right
Audio trackchevron_right
Chapterschevron_right
Autoplay On
Loop Off
Sticky player Off
Sleep timerOffchevron_right
Subtitles/CC On
Captionschevron_right
Keyboard shortcuts ?
Stats for nerds
Sleep timer ended
⏪ 10s
⏩ 10s

Greenland Deal: Greenland: A Trump Win or Danish Masterclass? • FRANCE 24 English

3.3K views • 1mo ago
Watch Party
42 Comments
@paulmollan9108
@@paulmollan9108Imported1mo ago
Danmark and the EU folded like s temu deck chair
@bubblebutt2.1
@@bubblebutt2.1Imported1mo ago
Its basically the same agreement as the one we signed with the us in 1951🫩
@atheist63
@@atheist63Imported1mo ago
In Trump's mind , he is one step closer to getting what he wants
@InterestingFlow1
@@InterestingFlow1Imported1mo ago
He's going to strut around like he invaded it anyway. Just like he would've he acted like he owned Canada if he signed a trade deal with us
@tassie7830
@@tassie7830Imported1mo ago
Danish master class, trump got exactly what in 1951 treaty.
@sulaco1156
@@sulaco1156Imported1mo ago
The Danish and Greenland government has not yet approve anything what Trump said. Their silence speak loud
@Noah-d5g9p
@@Noah-d5g9pImported1mo ago
Greenland will be the new settlement of people from Europe and USA who have had enough of Islamist dominating their countries and political landscape.<br>Greenland will be the new USA...!! <br>Just like new Amsterdam.
@barikada3030
@@barikada3030Imported1mo ago
Danmark must be careful, once he steps in there he might never wanna leave. Permanent control has 1000 variations.
@PromainShow
@@PromainShowImported1mo ago
USA got exactly what it wanted, Trump never actually wanted to take Greenland, it&#39;s called aim huge and &quot;settle&quot; for what you really want - here&#39;s what USA got that is NEW:<br>1. EXPANDED military presence that is NOW PERMANENT<br>2. Sensitive Investments need explicit U.S. approval<br>3. All adversaries banned from making bases or having a presence through businesses or investment, CHINA and RUSSIA now BANNED<br>4. The new framework is EXPLICITLY trilateral between Denmark Greenland and USA not NATO<br><br>And that’s just a few points
@jansurlykkeschack7955
@@jansurlykkeschack7955Imported1mo ago
The only difference from the 1951 treaty, this one will have Donald Trumps signature - that&#39;s it!
@CuriousCrow-q2c
@@CuriousCrow-q2cImported1mo ago
erm? How did you do a whole interview on the US/Denmark/Greenland agreement without asking about Greenland&#39;s natural resources? Everyone knows that the USA&#39;s main motive is to steal resources. Did Denmark and Greenland turn them over, as Venezuela&#39;s &quot;interim&quot; puppet did? Have US corporations been given the right to destroy the Greenlandic environment and turn over its riches to American oligarchs?
@jamesbruce8749
@@jamesbruce8749Imported1mo ago
Never invite a Vampire into your home.
@whyromesucks
@@whyromesucksImported1mo ago
Grow up! The only credible threat to Greenland was and still is the US and Trump! Invoking bogeymen like China and Russia is nonsense.
@jargamboge4796
@@jargamboge4796Imported1mo ago
Weak European surrendering as always
@CK-jo9im
@@CK-jo9imImported1mo ago
Where is the masterclass when you have surrendered the Island to the USA? What is there to celebrate about? Its a lost Island, without a single shot fired.
@danielpriest4606
@@danielpriest4606Imported1mo ago
He creates a problem that doesn&#39;t exist. Them &quot;presumably&quot; makes a deal that&#39;s been in place since 1951.<br>Taking credit for something he didn&#39;t do.<br>That sounds about right.
@dwijfouzdar4113
@@dwijfouzdar4113Imported1mo ago
Wow you Europeans are now truly a colony of usa and how is that sovereignity ...
@briangreig4225
@@briangreig4225Imported1mo ago
Good luck with having the U.S. live up to their side of any agreement - at least for the next two years!
@HeBeDrGB
@@HeBeDrGBImported1mo ago
This is a win-win-win for Greenland, Denmark and the US - which is the way it should be!
@Zefurion1988
@@Zefurion1988Imported1mo ago
I do not trust the Trump administration. This deal may backfire.
@libiure
@@libiureImported1mo ago
&#39;only usa equipment - no russian or china equipment &#39; - what if the usa doesn&#39;t have any &#39;equipment&#39; for greenland?
@PhillipBell
@@PhillipBellImported1mo ago
Don&#39;t worry, in Trump&#39;s mind, he still took over Greenland. Expect him to erect a gold statue of himself there.
@MDReaz-l4z
@@MDReaz-l4zImported1mo ago
Bajaj investment in Merlin Selena and Merlin Azure and Merlin Impenia is famous in India and attached with crent NSE 50 stock Market in India with Mohammed Reaz from Kolkata to Mumbai and France 24 channel is famous in India
@PanikosElias
@@PanikosEliasImported1mo ago
LET ME GES GREENLAND IS USA TERRITORY??? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@libiure
@@libiureImported1mo ago
greenland needs to join canada - demark just sold them down the river ..
@TommySchumann-p4b
@@TommySchumann-p4bImported1mo ago
This poor presenter, he seems so pained by the Agreement. Never change France 24, never change.
@Optimistic-101
@@Optimistic-101Imported1mo ago
Trumps a shithouse. Nothing more, nothing less.
@HébertBourguignon
@@HébertBourguignonImported1mo ago
Greenland: A Trump Win or Danish Masterclass?<br>OR a nothing burger?
@libiure
@@libiureImported1mo ago
europe: 500 years of poor choices ..
@farrellware8399
@@farrellware8399Imported1mo ago
Yet another fantastic nothing burger. Exactly what does the 1951 agreement state? Hummmmm, the same! Just another bullying so ol don can make some statements on what a great States man he is. Hopefully some of this will be curtailed in midterms. And after the next president will undoubtedly dissolve the great ones damage will be undone.
@Nas-TCanadian
@@Nas-TCanadianImported1mo ago
The biggest military in the world couldn&#39;t beat little old Iran. Do you really want them as your defence strategy?
@aaronhelvig9444
@@aaronhelvig9444Imported1mo ago
Huge Trump win. I’m voting MAGA in November 💪🏾😎🇺🇸
@williejon1229
@@williejon1229Imported1mo ago
Uhh...no. The US has veto rights over investments in Greenland, potentially excluding what had been considered traditional enemies,
@MadelineD20
@@MadelineD20Imported1mo ago
We&#39;ve been saying this entire time: YOU chose to abandon those bases, you&#39;re welcome to use them again ANY TIME.<br>None of these threats were necessary and they only diminished trust between partners.
@leahcasey2678
@@leahcasey2678Imported1mo ago
Ironically, China is currently Greenland&#39;s 2nd largest trading partner (after Denmark) ... Greenland conducts almost 12x as much trade with China as it does with the US.<br>The head of NATO&#39;s Arctic Command has stated that he has never seen a Russian or Chinese military ship enter into Greenland&#39;s waters.<br>No matter what&#39;s written in this agreement, Denmark, Greenland and the EU would be nuts to sign anything with the US. Let the existing 1951 Agreement stand as is.
@mugepurvis2955
@@mugepurvis2955Imported1mo ago
Trump is desperately looking for a trophy for his legacy and success story for the upcoming mid-term election.
@jbond5834
@@jbond5834Imported1mo ago
get ready iceland
@AbreyFandos
@@AbreyFandosImported1mo ago
Evorum feels like the one project everyone will wish they bought early, 100x vibes all over this.
@DrezJain
@@DrezJainImported1mo ago
Evorum is one of the last real opportunities to make serious gains, this could be the million-maker of this bull run.
@AahFukIt
@@AahFukItImported1mo ago
Im Danish never heard about Lars Christian Brask !😂😂😂
@proppo4924
@@proppo4924Imported1mo ago
Totally undercuts the Mark and Ursula love affair. Go back and look for the reaction at the Danish table when Carney brings up it&#39;s &quot;closeness&quot; with Denmark in his EU speech.
@75thRRviewer
@@75thRRviewerImported1mo ago
here&#39;s whats new; US has veto rights over &quot;adversarial development&quot; in Denmark, rights are &quot;bulletproof&quot; from any political changes in Denmark or Greenland, case-by-case approval from Denmark or Greenland for US build out no longer needed. Some will say it&#39;s the same, but they haven&#39;t compared the agreements....it&#39;s significant.