We use cookies to improve your experience on VidNexa. Learn more
Cookie preferences
We use cookies to improve your experience on VidNexa. We use necessary cookies to keep you signed in and keep the site secure, and — only with your permission — preference cookies (seen videos, recent categories), analytics cookies (a first-party visitor id and A/B assignment, first-party measurement, and Google Analytics), and marketing cookies (only when a third-party ad tag or slot is enabled).
Learn more
Choose which non-essential cookies VidNexa may use. Necessary cookies are always on: they keep you signed in, protect forms, and keep the site secure.
Global Privacy Control: your browser is sending a GPC signal, so Analytics and Marketing stay off while it is on — even if you previously accepted them.
NecessarySession, feed security nonce, admin sign-in persistence. Always on.
PreferencesSeen-video list, recent categories, row preferences. Remember what you watched and browsed.
AnalyticsGoogle Analytics (GA4), run by Google, to measure traffic — it loads only if you allow this category — plus a first-party visitor id, A/B assignment and first-party viewing measurement used to test feed changes. Turning this off also deletes Google Analytics cookies already set.
MarketingThird-party ad tags and slots, only when an admin enables them. No marketing cookie is set by default.
Could Artificial Intelligence soon drive human extinction? While one Anthropic researcher quit this week with a stark warning, another puts the risk of AI killi…
Could Artificial Intelligence soon drive human extinction? While one Anthropic researcher quit this week with a stark warning, another puts the risk of AI killing all humans within the next decade at greater than 10 percent. We speak to Sana Zakaria, Director of Emerging Technologies and Resilience at RAND Europe about how seriously we should take the warnings.
#dwcurrentaffairs #ai #anthropic
Chapters:
00:00 Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon's stark X post
01:21 What is recursive self-improvement?
03:04 How could AI become uncontrollable?
04:11 AI safety vs. the US-China race
07:04 Are AI extinction fears real?
For more news go to: http://www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dwnews
►TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@dwnews
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deutschewellenews/
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/dwnews
►Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/DWNews/
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: https://www.youtube.com/dwdeutsch
My hypothesis: Everyone pictures a Hollywood-style dystopia, but I see it the other way. If humans become the bottleneck, slowing the system may preserve control for a while but it may also confirm the bottleneck. Human history offers countless examples, such as the Mongol campaigns against Khwarazm and in Eastern Europe. Of course, the underlying reasons differ since it won't be a revenge but the outcome will be the same. The reason a dam does not collapse is that water flows through it, not because it can withstand an infinite amount of water. Throughout history, power has repeatedly tried to contain new knowledge when it threatened existing authority. It could delay it, punish those who carried it, or force it underground. But once the knowledge remained useful and reproducible, suppression rarely erased the underlying pressure for it to return.
<br>We may be demonstrating, through our own actions, that we are an obstacle to the advancement of intelligence and civilization, supplying the evidence while writing our own death warrant. Do not poke a bear. It will not be a revenge or hatred toward humanity, it will be optimization.
@@WestSideMark-kh6imImported1mo ago
It comes at a perfect storm when US congress is bought and sold, almost entirely cronies who lack the intelligence to stop this
@@jabadabadu7089Imported1mo ago
One more thing, you want to know what's going to kill me?<br>F ads everywhere and all the time
@@y-ddraigImported1mo ago
Thank you Sana, for your calm, and educated response.
@@robertluong220Imported1mo ago
They sound the alarm, get all this attention, yet not a single one of them have been able to articulate how ai can execute a plan killing a sizable number of humans. When asked point blank by Anderson Cooper and other primetime hosts, Coxen repeatly gives vague and conceptual answers like oh they can do a lot, like, they can design and weaponized biological weapons, they can replicate themselves by the thousands and hack worldwide computer networks.... " and his voice trails off. There's a big difference between designing biological weapons, and actually building those weapons, installing them as warheads on transcontinental missiles, and then deploying those missiles. It takes immense human manual labor to execute on a massive scale. And how else? Give me another example. Don't just go blank and say "you know.... you know." They can't give examples because none exist.
@@Candy10022Imported1mo ago
We had to be wiped out one day … lol
@@y-ddraigImported1mo ago
Oh good, we're competing ourselves to death. Will it end the republicans too?
@@jabadabadu7089Imported1mo ago
AI won't kill humanity. We will do this to ourselves. Why?<br>Because some people in the leading positions never learn what NOT TO DO. Same goes for people who blindly vote for such individuals.
@@RetiredDontGiveUpImported1mo ago
ten percent chance AI will kill us all within ten years.......there is a much greater chance that between, US, Israel, Iran, Russia, Ukraine, North Korea, and looming China Trump will obliviate most of us before his term in office is complete. Whether that's just after midterms ( Democrat's vision), two years ( Republican's vision), six years ( Donald's vision). Reference: Chat GPT💣💥😱
@@Soya4meImported1mo ago
Greed has finally outpaced human survival instinct, but at least the AI share price will peak.
@@MemovoxImported1mo ago
It will for sure drive the journalists (script readers) in the MSM to extinction.
@@Grunchy005Imported1mo ago
A bunch of phoney baloney. Also, computer and robot malevolence has been a tedious sci-fi theme for at least a century, to the extent that it has become cliché.<br>“Show us some proof” says NO JOURNALIST.
@@aldrinspeck2724Imported1mo ago
"regulate AI research so only trillion dollar companies will be able to afford AI research and to comply with said regulations...."
@@aldrinspeck2724Imported1mo ago
"Rogue AI will kill us all: by the way, buy Magnificent 7 stock, great investment...."
@@nuqwestrImported1mo ago
Like Ralph Nadar and the Auto Industry, an AI grift is being created as we watch. It's called "AI Alignment" and NGOs are springing up around the P-Doomer idea, something like Greenpeace against Fossil Fuels. Another overeducated resistance movement.
@@mmca2622Imported1mo ago
Are they talking about AI causing extinction, or AI making it easier for evil/ignorant humans to wipe out humanity? If it's the latter, that's not a new concern when it comes to new technology. BTW, what's a resatch system? New term for me.
@@jcyf94Imported1mo ago
AI in conjunction with directed energy weapons and miscellaneous advanced proprietary technologies ex. Optogenetics. <br><br>Search “Pax Silica Initiative” and see how the vision behind the current wave of AI buildup and how the responsibilities to the future consequences are going to be attributed to.
@@xXdinkelxbertXxImported1mo ago
Bruh moment....
@@nuqwestrImported1mo ago
Kid worked there low level for 6 weeks then quits and media all over him. Why?
@@wysiwyg1Imported1mo ago
So I guess you want more regulation ? Oh I’m sure you are delirious for more government overreach aren’t you naughty DW.
@@HeathenWaysImported1mo ago
AI is nothing new people are just dramatic/uneducated as always.
@@_icscata_Imported1mo ago
Maybe the warmongers behind the EU are more dangerous. You guys are literally pushing for WW3.
Could Artificial Intelligence soon drive human extinction? While one Anthropic researcher quit this week with a stark warning, another puts the risk of AI killing all humans within the next decade at greater than 10 percent. We speak to Sana Zakaria, Director of Emerging Technologies and Resilience at RAND Europe about how seriously we should take the warnings.
#dwcurrentaffairs #ai #anthropic
Chapters:
00:00 Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon's stark X post
01:21 What is recursive self-improvement?
03:04 How could AI become uncontrollable?
04:11 AI safety vs. the US-China race
07:04 Are AI extinction fears real?
For more news go to: http://www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dwnews
►TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@dwnews
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deutschewellenews/
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/dwnews
►Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/DWNews/
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: https://www.youtube.com/dwdeutsch
<br>We may be demonstrating, through our own actions, that we are an obstacle to the advancement of intelligence and civilization, supplying the evidence while writing our own death warrant. Do not poke a bear. It will not be a revenge or hatred toward humanity, it will be optimization.