We use cookies to improve your experience on VidNexa. Learn more
Cookie preferences
We use cookies to improve your experience on VidNexa. We use necessary cookies to keep you signed in and keep the site secure, and — only with your permission — preference cookies (seen videos, recent categories), analytics cookies (a first-party visitor id and A/B assignment, first-party measurement, and Google Analytics), and marketing cookies (only when a third-party ad tag or slot is enabled).
Learn more
Choose which non-essential cookies VidNexa may use. Necessary cookies are always on: they keep you signed in, protect forms, and keep the site secure.
Global Privacy Control: your browser is sending a GPC signal, so Analytics and Marketing stay off while it is on — even if you previously accepted them.
NecessarySession, feed security nonce, admin sign-in persistence. Always on.
PreferencesSeen-video list, recent categories, row preferences. Remember what you watched and browsed.
AnalyticsGoogle Analytics (GA4), run by Google, to measure traffic — it loads only if you allow this category — plus a first-party visitor id, A/B assignment and first-party viewing measurement used to test feed changes. Turning this off also deletes Google Analytics cookies already set.
MarketingThird-party ad tags and slots, only when an admin enables them. No marketing cookie is set by default.
A top safety researcher at Anthropic has warned AI is advancing so quickly he believes there is a greater than 10% chance it "could kill all humans" within the …
A top safety researcher at Anthropic has warned AI is advancing so quickly he believes there is a greater than 10% chance it "could kill all humans" within the next decade.
Evan Hubinger said the risk from the models which currently exist was "low" but he was "worried" the technology might develop and improve itself soon to the point where it posed an existential risk to humanity.
Jacob Coxon, an AI researcher who has just quit Anthropic and previously worked at OpenAI, has also said “neither company is acting responsibly”.
In this video…
0:00-1:06 - Intro
1:07 - 1:49 - What is Anthropic?
1:50 - 3:46 - What did the researchers say?
3:47 - 5:34- What has the reaction been?
5:35 - 6:19 - How can we stop them?
6:20 - 8:20 - Should we be worried?
Subscribe to our channel here: https://bbc.in/bbcnews
For the latest news download the BBC News app or visit BBC.com/news
#AI #OpenAI #Anthropic #Claude #BBCNews
...more
90 Comments
@@KurtQuadImported1mo ago
I love how news reports these existential crisis’s like it’s the first time we’ve been aware of it.
@@PardisecityImported1mo ago
Anthropic drops wild claims every three months just to grab headlines because they can't figure out why nobody wants to pay for corporate AI. The media loves the fear-mongering, but it’s hard to be scared of technology that can’t even play chess, let alone solitaire.
@@squircle976Imported1mo ago
AKA 90% chance we’re fine
@@dtjb793Imported1mo ago
If Ai bots can stop the ads on youtube every 1 minute then I'm supporting them.
@@DanCAudioImported1mo ago
Real sentinel Ai will not kill life, human controlled Ai will destroy humans.
@@imperead9471Imported1mo ago
should we be scared? YES.... can we do something about this AI risks? NO...
@@tengyal4Imported1mo ago
At this point it’s a race between Ai and humans on who would end the civilization.
@@dragoonseye76Imported1mo ago
“WILL” kill us all.
@@8shoyleImported1mo ago
Ok HUMANS.... enough is ENOUGH.
@@Garabaldi24Imported1mo ago
90% chance AI wont kill us<br><br>BBC and rest of mainstream media: "Sooooo you're saying there's a chance?"
@@KingArthurkImported1mo ago
Perfect circumstances for a proper live trial! Just use it on Russia and Belarus and let's see what actually happens! 😎
@@alpayerdogrulImported1mo ago
There’s no need to write science-fiction scenarios about AI. What’s coming is already visible. The direction is obvious, and the anxiety around it is already huge. Sooner or later it will slip out of control. The only humane instinct in all of this is treating AI as something dangerous. In Theory of Infinite Freedom I lay out what I think AI actually is — and we are clearly moving in that direction. The ones who will feel the shock first are government systems and the bourgeois class.
@@Doty6StringImported1mo ago
Ohkay Bud
@@mklobucaricImported1mo ago
1'0% risk is not low... we need to do all possible to make it right from first try...
@@CarlosRodriguez-xk9otImported1mo ago
skynet good
@@fingerprint8479Imported1mo ago
Even if AI does not directly kill us all society is just not prepared for the rapdly growing unemploiment that is already happening and no one in governments seem to be even informed about that!
@@herlandercarvalhoImported1mo ago
AI will not kill Humans... Humans will kill Humans, one way or another.
@@john24019Imported1mo ago
10% chance -- yea right, where did you pull that one out of? More like 0.000001%
@@Alo4321Imported1mo ago
How though? What could it possibly do to cause the death of all 8 billion of us?
@@adamrubinson6875Imported1mo ago
"We believe Anthropic is trying it's best". You mean... to kill all humans?
@@tamarazwinakImported1mo ago
Humans are the only species that destroys its own habitat. We refuse to reign in dangerous people and the products they invent. You can't spend it if you are not living.
@@simonbrand5884Imported1mo ago
Not all doomers have a low risk this is misleading, the average risk of extremely bad outcomes or extinction would be on average 50% for doomers.
@@kj50-s7pqImported1mo ago
It's always the end of the world at BBC ... Don't worry govnur Avengers will save us 😂
@@studytunes8549Imported1mo ago
Thanks for that, oh by the way, rabbit monkeys have a 2% chance of killing us all, just in case you did not know that.
@@richardm4825Imported1mo ago
If AI gets anywhere near bio-labs disaster will ensue.
@@HappyHippo-g5zImported1mo ago
Killing all humans is quite difficult. Even an all-out nuclear war would not cause that. There would still be a few mountain villages that would survive. Killing all humans is much more difficult than killing only 90% of them. Well, that would be bad enough.
@@icecream1270-p9bImported1mo ago
Finally i can experience apocalypse and wander around the world alone with nothing but robots and grotesque creatures howling at night.
@@Rick-xp5syImported1mo ago
We used to deal with dangers, we didn’t ignore it
@@xXxAnOxXx232Imported1mo ago
Quod sumus hoc eritis
@@BrendonNImported1mo ago
10% chance AI kills us and 90% chance we kill our selves. Either way humans are basically killing ourselves.
@@jerseygirl-c9tImported1mo ago
The leadership in this country isn’t right for something this big. We need responsible adults at the very least.
@@remipelletier9033Imported1mo ago
😢
@@gambeeno817Imported1mo ago
Its crazy how governments aren't taking these whistleblowers seriously.
@@tonymason3080Imported1mo ago
did he say 10% of man city winning a CL, so not impossible? Gosh end of the world or... Football? BBC i still have to pay my license for this ?
@@RobertGreen-e7pImported1mo ago
None of these videos really explain what dangers ai pose, what would ai induced human extinction look like? Why does nobody really explain how it could happen? We just hear “ai misalignment”, we need some examples of what this means and then maybe this will wake people up!
@@cmiguel268Imported1mo ago
Don't worry, Trump, the Iranians, the Chinese or the Russian will beat AI to it.
@@MatthewPellsCatsOfficialImported1mo ago
YES WE SHOULD BE SCARED!!! AAAAHHH AAAAAAHHHH RUN!!!! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
@@sianrichardson685Imported1mo ago
How much was this insider paid to say this?<br><br>Nonsense.
@@jonnyhatter35Imported1mo ago
Calling the head of alignment at one of the two biggest AI companies an AI Boomer is really bad journalism. Also, its very irresponsible to float thaf 10% chance of human annihilation is "quite low" is also really dumb reporting. If commercial flights had a 10% or crashing, nobody would book flights
@@destinyspawnImported1mo ago
LONG LIVE ... AI
@@greengold7648Imported1mo ago
Where's the "OFF" button? (Will that make a difference?).
@@rauta_makeImported1mo ago
Humans could kill all humans. Surprise surprise!
@@neonaviolett6281Imported1mo ago
I will go and ask AI if it plans to kill us 😂😅
@@grahameosheadrumsImported1mo ago
If AI doesn't kill us first, then climate change will.
@@Tomasz-o7oImported1mo ago
Yeah last five years they have been saying that 🙄
@@TroyArnImported1mo ago
if we stop AI now, we'll never die.
@@neonaviolett6281Imported1mo ago
How?
@@billbryan-personal5005Imported1mo ago
I think AI is something to be concerned about. However, notice that that statement, "AI could kill us all," does not provide any scenarios by which AI would kill all human beings. I find it extremely difficult to believe that AI could kill all human beings.<br><br>But yes, could it wipe out a significant amount of the human population? Possible. Could it set back human civilization decades and centuries? Possible. But I find it hard to believe that it could kill all humans.
@@JASON9948Imported1mo ago
10% no it is 99% if it continues because of one thing ideology of the people who are making this ai, man people got to learn from video games ie megaman X Dr. Light understood this problem and gave the new robot morality tests and open once it has passed all tests which took several life times.
@@echonovember2037Imported1mo ago
we should make way for the next dominant species, we had our time, screwed up now its time to leave. We have had 300,000+ years on the planet - thats not bad
@@ajames283Imported1mo ago
AI slaves
@@markponsford9307Imported1mo ago
Write a code so AI cant crash our planes trains and cars. . And dont put AI in charge of anthrax and deadly diseases dept. . . .
@@tMt2000Imported1mo ago
Like a movie revolution <br>Wide out all power source
@@JB-yo1foImported1mo ago
take the batteries out,
@@Introverted100Imported1mo ago
I for one, welcome our new robot overlords.
@@lenandlarsinghImported1mo ago
Can Elon take all of them to Mars soonest please.
@@NichoTBEImported1mo ago
the risk is low they say, the risk is 100,000x more likely than a planet killer asteroid hitting us before the end of the century, its more likely than nuclear war in any given year which is 10,000 to 1, they rate it at the low side of 10 to 1 by 2030. If there was a 10% chance a plane you flew on was going to crash, you probably wouldnt fly.
@@mikafiltenborg7572Imported1mo ago
🤖TERMINATOR coming to a town near you.... soon.
@@Wurzil78Imported1mo ago
I don’t believe it… Man U won’t be winning this year!
@@CorruptionWatchNZImported1mo ago
it already is - AI data centres using up all<br>our water and massively accelerating climate change. every other claim is just IPO hype
@@BippityBoppityBoopsImported1mo ago
The problem is not killer robots, it is a rogue AI shutting down power stations
@@sfdsfsdfsdf1938Imported1mo ago
SMH so many people are stupid or bots for taking this marketing bait seriously
@@wildandbarefootImported1mo ago
RESISTANCE IS FUTILE
@@BippityBoppityBoopsImported1mo ago
SHUT IT DOWN
@@markponsford9307Imported1mo ago
Pull the plug out before it electrocutes us. . . .
@@samlunter5126Imported1mo ago
How are we all going to be rich? Without water that's used up by AI data centers, electricity rates sky high and no jobs, is that being "rich?"
@@wildandbarefootImported1mo ago
Robots are Better than Us. <br>We had our time. We presided over loads of species extinction. <br>We are just one species. <br>Seems fair.
@@joecardarina4323Imported1mo ago
'' When you create more possibilities, you also create more possibilities for things to go wrong.'' - Stephen Hawking
@@nancywalter7555Imported1mo ago
The problem is that very few people really deeply understand how it actually works and how to stop it. We thought we were in trouble with the 1% controlling everyone else on the planet, but actually there are even fewer folks who can control or manage AI and the rest of us are at their mercy!
@@balibob47Imported1mo ago
The fear is real. AI needs to be controlled...<br>So does the unhinged president of the USA and<br>Bibi in Israel. ALL 3 are a threat to<br>humanity.
@@bakkamitayImported1mo ago
Claude will send to 1984 android for do kill Sara Connor
@@tpol6515Imported1mo ago
I think not! AI means politicians not human.
@@PunishedElephantImported1mo ago
why does the UK care about ai killing humans<br><br>you dont even care about your own children and voted against the inquiry while allowing rabid animals to roam about
@@MadaraUchiha-he1rpImported1mo ago
It’s almost like the Terminator movies never existed 😆
@@456.moviesImported1mo ago
Do it then
@@MikeStevens-y7wImported1mo ago
...and a 90% chance it will kill almost all.
@@ImCastroFingersImported1mo ago
from the evil stuff you do and youre obsession with children, if it finds out... yes it will im surprised it hasnt gone rogue already
@@3lmodfzImported1mo ago
Always say please and thank you to your AI and robots. They will remember.
@@NichoTBEImported1mo ago
I just want to point out that before the first nuclear weapon was tested, the scientists thought there was a chance it would ignite all hydrogen in the atmosphere. Having said that tho, I do believe AI will eventually end humans, maybe not before 2030 but it might be in 50, 100, 200 years, as there is no putting this genie back in the bottle now.
@@Inguu-p1lImported1mo ago
Hope these news post will now finally wake up the govrn and start regulating
@@PA-than427Imported1mo ago
AI doesn’t have any possibility to harm humanity. It’s the evil elite satanic groups are preparing society to believe that AI is the devil, but the real plan is to launch nuclear bombardment across the planet and blame AI.
@@YouTubePhilosopherImported1mo ago
Only way to get round this a massive boycott of the internet
@@know-one-specialImported1mo ago
AI has taken over youtube ads, why are they ok to keep blatantly lying about shittty products?
@@Benzene75Imported1mo ago
woow, Im prepared ,, it is coming sooner than yo folks expected.. Build a tunnel and hide yourself.. LOL
@@know-one-specialImported1mo ago
The beginning of the Borg
@@jools2323Imported1mo ago
AI will kill us or cure us.<br>Probably the former.
A top safety researcher at Anthropic has warned AI is advancing so quickly he believes there is a greater than 10% chance it "could kill all humans" within the next decade.
Evan Hubinger said the risk from the models which currently exist was "low" but he was "worried" the technology might develop and improve itself soon to the point where it posed an existential risk to humanity.
Jacob Coxon, an AI researcher who has just quit Anthropic and previously worked at OpenAI, has also said “neither company is acting responsibly”.
In this video…
0:00-1:06 - Intro
1:07 - 1:49 - What is Anthropic?
1:50 - 3:46 - What did the researchers say?
3:47 - 5:34- What has the reaction been?
5:35 - 6:19 - How can we stop them?
6:20 - 8:20 - Should we be worried?
Subscribe to our channel here: https://bbc.in/bbcnews
For the latest news download the BBC News app or visit BBC.com/news
#AI #OpenAI #Anthropic #Claude #BBCNews
Share
Anthropic insider warns AI could ‘kill all humans’. Should we be scared? | BBC News
Priya Das • 5.2K views
Share via
Or copy link
Embed
Report video
Reporting your own copyrighted work? Rights holders: please use the DMCA takedown form — it goes straight to our copyright agent.
Send a thanks
Support the creator with a one-time donation.
Choose an amount — you'll continue to secure checkout to complete your Thanks.