We use cookies to improve your experience on Vidnexa. We use necessary cookies to keep you signed in and keep the site secure, and — only with your permission — preference cookies (seen videos, recent categories), analytics cookies (anonymous visitor id, A/B assignment), and marketing cookies (only when a third-party ad tag or slot is enabled).
Learn more
Cookie preferences
Choose which non-essential cookies Vidnexa may use. Necessary cookies are always on: they keep you signed in, protect forms, and keep the site secure.
NecessarySession, feed security nonce, admin sign-in persistence. Always on.
PreferencesSeen-video list, recent categories, row preferences. Remember what you watched and browsed.
AnalyticsAnonymous visitor id and A/B assignment, used to measure traffic and test feed changes.
MarketingThird-party ad tags and slots, only when an admin enables them. No marketing cookie is set by default.
Continue watching?
Resume from 00:00
Up next
00:00 / 00:00
QualityAutochevron_right
Playback speedchevron_right
Audio trackchevron_right
Chapterschevron_right
Autoplay On
Loop Off
Sticky player Off
Sleep timerOffchevron_right
Subtitles/CC On
Captionschevron_right
Keyboard shortcuts ?
Stats for nerds
chevron_left Back
Auto
144p
240p
360p
480p
720p
1080p HD
1440p HD
0.25×
0.5×
0.75×
Normal
1.25×
1.5×
1.75×
2×
chevron_left Back
chevron_left Back
Caption size: Small
Caption size: Medium
Caption size: Large
Caption colour: White
Caption colour: Yellow
Caption background: Off
Caption background: Dark
chevron_left Back
chevron_left Back
chevron_left Back
Off
When video ends
5 minutes
10 minutes
15 minutes
20 minutes
30 minutes
40 minutes
50 minutes
60 minutes
Sleep timer ended
⏪ 10s
⏩ 10s
‹‹
10 seconds
››
10 seconds
Keyboard shortcuts
Space / K — play or pause
J / L — back / forward 10 seconds
Left / Right — back / forward 5 seconds
Up / Down — volume
M — mute
F — fullscreen
T — theater mode
C — captions
0–9 — jump to a position
Shift+? — this help
Cindy Cohn breaks down why AI companies won't tell you what they're actually doing with your data
Ai is not doing anything different than what our own brains do all the time. Stop making it sound so nefarious and weird and evil. They're just applications and they use repetitive operations to learn not only the right but the wrong ways to do things just like we do. <br><br>Ai's literally just making our lives easier... So our toughest problem May one day be figuring out the right amount for Ubi. <br><br>Most people don't really like to work so I don't see the problem with any of this. They'll get to sit around and play video games and get fat and watch TV and do drugs.
It is already past that point. I can see the bleed from my laptop to my cell to YouTube to my feed...<br>Algorithms and lack of privacy, but I am more concerned about the "narrative architecture" promoting ideological views, censorship, anti trust and intellectual property theft is rampant.
Why would those who can, being the ones most ferociously advocating, stifle the advancement by imposing any definition of a limiting law regulation???😅😅😅
The most important thing in all of this is to recognize that they have systemized and automated the extraction of the totality of human though, and converted it for private gain. They need to pay a royalty or profit share to the Public.
And copyright enforcement on everything that AI uses and feeds itself with. AI is a scam based on abusing intellectual and artistic property on a huge industrial scale.
How many times did he rehearse that ridiculous question, only to be met with a answer that starts with privacy law haha. The data was already there available on search engines years ago. The difference is now instead of a human synthesising that information, a LLM is doing that for them.
John, its a glorified search engine that can synthesise information, get of your high horse. We'll still need humans for many things, uts a productivity tool. If there are issues in education those will have to be fixed.
The internet and google commoditized access to information, AI will commoditize critical thinking skills. Not sure what she is talking about with privacy, sounds like someone who has never used Chat, Gemini or Claude, they basically incorporate everything you’ve queried them on into the “ongoing relationship”. Now, how you regulate them sharing that information with 3rd parties will be a very interesting task.
There are no guard rails in AI because the megalomaniac oligarchic Power Hungary billionaires running it don’t want guard rails. We are in deep deep do do.😢
Government structures in America are so captured corrupt bought that they cannot be relied upon to pass any meaningful incursion or restraint or regulation on laissez Ferris neofudalist corporatism. The interest conflicted influence peddlers who grasp at the ring of Public Power not to govern better but rather to abuse that power to leverage their own personal and ideological psychopathies over millions of people they betray the public routinely they wage austericist warfare against the public they defy defile and ignore their fiduciary duty of care obligations they are in fact ages for the neo-feudalist crony corpuses cryptocracy
It's not about limiting it because they'll just go oops and blame a lower level employee or whatever and pay the fine. No. We need to force them to delete their work. They cannot profit at all from what they are doing and as long as they can there will always be too much incentive to steal from us for them to stop.<br>Grok is not only used to undress women, but to make child corn as well. It should be gone. A fine is just cost of business and they don't even have that.
People who fear the future are hilarious to me. People pushed back on every technological advancement in the last 200 years.<br><br>Washing machines? Refrigerators? Motor vehicles? Electricity? Computers?<br><br>Yep, all had pushback from the "everyday" person. Just accept it. AI is here, it's been here, we knew it was coming decades ago.<br><br>Get. Over. It.
Quite literally, they're destroying the original copies of works and buying out almost every copy of those works in order to stop their competitors from getting access to the same trading data
This is laughable when everyone from your job to your creditors to the federal credit bureaus all are harvesting your data and identity for profit. <br>You couldn't stop this even without a device.
The AI business model is essentially "I want to be left alone and unregulated when I profit from the things I have stolen."<br>It is neither an accident nor a coincidence that most of the AI leaders come across as thoroughly amoral sociopaths.
We dont need a better privacy law, We need a Law to ban companies from collecting any DATA on us.<br>Anless we allow it, and adding rules to there contract "you are allowing us to collect data blabla bla. NO Go anymore, not allowed"
That's the system. Perfectly running. We create systems to enhance protect ourselves only to ultimately have those systems turn on us and control us.
This episode of "The Daily Show" aired 30th March 2026.<br>Jon Stewart interviews Cindy Cohn, Electronic Frontier Foundation executive director, about her memoir "Privacy's Defender: My Thirty-Year Fight Against Digital Surveillance."
Too little. Too late. They already grabbed everything they could get a hold of and ran for the money.<br>Now they are so rich and unfailable in their AI bubble that no government in the US or Asia will do anything about it. Only the EU might.
The companies who have been stealing data, and collecting data should just be dissolved, and the people running them should just be thrown in jail for cyber stalking and intellectual property theft. <br><br>Their assets liquidated and used to back pay the people whose work was used to train these models. <br><br>And going forward, AI services should not be able to charge money, because they were trained on things made by our entire collective.
The application of patent protection and rights should be limited the larger your company profit gets versus the normal worker or small business. The bigger a company is, the more it should be the focus of oversight and the less it should itself have a right to privacy. Essentially, things like 'right to privacy' should be done on a scale where the highest leaders have the most transparency demanded of them (almost like live streaming most of their lives to public records), while the least powerful common workers get the most privacy, the most protected rights.
Art, Literature, Movies and Television could all become AI works, of course, based off other real, prior works, but without laws, creativity could no longer be copy written, so you would pay to watch or read things based on scans of what's already out there. Nobody to pay for it, or, free money.
Checkout what Australia is about to do.<br>No more EULA to get a service<br>Smart glass to blur face and know when on<br>Only keep data on what the company needs and only for recent customers.<br><br>The company has to have eraserua laws
Unfortunately, these laws instead of protecting nuts, protect them from companies taken over their markets because they use better technologies and offer better service for the dollar
This isn’t just about creativity. It takes our literal voices and replicates it. It takes our faces and forms other faces. It monitors our movements to predict us as if WE are machines. It takes our humanity.
AI as a tool, we can control how We use it chat bots, ai video tools etc. but these megalomaniacal yt guys that are against regulation are who we need to fight to put laws I'm place, mfs are using AI to not hire people for jobs,,, WE the PEOPLE have to fight for comprehensive privacy laws
Dear lawyers. <br>It's not spying, it's stalking, stealing and pushing the contraband - and there are laws against it. <br>They also got their "consent" with trickery, and uses everybody's content if one clicks accept or not.