We use cookies to improve your experience on VidNexa. Learn more
Cookie preferences
We use cookies to improve your experience on VidNexa. We use necessary cookies to keep you signed in and keep the site secure, and — only with your permission — preference cookies (seen videos, recent categories), analytics cookies (a first-party visitor id and A/B assignment, first-party measurement, and Google Analytics), and marketing cookies (only when a third-party ad tag or slot is enabled).
Learn more
Choose which non-essential cookies VidNexa may use. Necessary cookies are always on: they keep you signed in, protect forms, and keep the site secure.
Global Privacy Control: your browser is sending a GPC signal, so Analytics and Marketing stay off while it is on — even if you previously accepted them.
NecessarySession, feed security nonce, admin sign-in persistence. Always on.
PreferencesSeen-video list, recent categories, row preferences. Remember what you watched and browsed.
AnalyticsGoogle Analytics (GA4), run by Google, to measure traffic — it loads only if you allow this category — plus a first-party visitor id, A/B assignment and first-party viewing measurement used to test feed changes. Turning this off also deletes Google Analytics cookies already set.
MarketingThird-party ad tags and slots, only when an admin enables them. No marketing cookie is set by default.
The Judge at the Lindsay Clancy trial sent the jurors back into deliberation after repeating instructions that the jurors must abide by reasonable doubt laws.
The Judge at the Lindsay Clancy trial sent the jurors back into deliberation after repeating instructions that the jurors must abide by reasonable doubt laws.
...more
28 Comments
@@dagon-cw7mcImported2mo ago
What the judge is saying would confuse the hell out of me. Did she not kill her own children? What are we talking about then? What’s innocent in murdering multiple of your own children?
@@sybill123fulImported2mo ago
sounds like prosecution genuinely ruined their own case
@@DRnab1983Imported2mo ago
Any other site the burden would be on lyndsey
@@manda-420Imported2mo ago
Anyone who has a metal illness and killed there 3 children would of been guilty already this is crazy
@@larjasoulImported2mo ago
she got a uav
@@King_arthurs_69Imported2mo ago
Liberal women = trash
@@sharpes07ifyImported2mo ago
Guilty 😂😂😂😂
@@MrLicobabyImported2mo ago
I’m actually embarrassed by the ppl that support this murderer. I hope she rots in hell.
@@Erika-RemiGirlImported2mo ago
I'm late to the 'game'.....what's the ratio?? male/female jurors??
@@Clint-n1pImported2mo ago
She was hormonal you can't hold women to the same standards as men at this point I am surprised CNN isn't calling it just post birth abortions
@@ErikTheWizImported2mo ago
What an odd case. If she was under a psychosis, how guilty is she? What punishments should she face?
@@arzhollowwImported2mo ago
Only in America where a woman could kill her children and possibly walk free. Justice system is failing. What a disgrace
@@KevinWatters-m8dImported2mo ago
It has nothing to do with reasonable doubt. It has to do with the fact that the ENTIRE system LET her down when she reached out for help and they IGNORED her. <br><br>I will not condemn anyone to death or a life sentence when SOCIETY its seif is partly to blame.
@@chantheman8443Imported2mo ago
Hero juror holding out to get this murderer convicted.
@@MWP0819Imported2mo ago
Murder, looting, and wide open borders are now legal
@@entarr2604Imported2mo ago
The Jury is 9 women 3 men. It must be infuriating that there's someone(s) on that Jury who can't convict this monster. <br><br>Whoever is trying to throw a mistrial or cast a not guilty verdict is about to undo 100+ years of women rights. They call it not guilty due to hormonal insanity, it set a precedent. It would mean all women everywhere can not be trusted in highly stressful situations or too much responsibilities. <br><br>Women won't be able to drive a car, vote, hold a job of any kind, can't run for office, can't enter a contract - that means no land/home ownership, buying a car, renting a place, or even getting a credit card. You ladies will need a man, who is sensible, for that. <br><br>Women supporting this monster are clueless and stupid. Way to piss your right away.
@@DeniseSaxton-t3rImported2mo ago
Nope, its Trump world now. Challenge everything. 😮😮😮
@@a-l-l-e-n01Imported2mo ago
I think we can all agree this lady should get nothing short of a tree branch and strong rope for what she did to her kids.
@@guitarslop-o8gImported2mo ago
This is what we get in a society where men have allowed women to run amok. Mutilating their bodies with stupid tattoos and pieces of metal in their faces, stupid hair colors, toxic feminist ideology, unrestricted abortion, voting based on feelings and not what’s moral and/or logical, etc etc. And now we can’t even decide if a woman who murdered her children should be held responsible. Not to mention all the women supporting her & all the gofundme money raised…..
@@RC-rd4rbImported2mo ago
You are not required to follow the judges instructions when in the jury room. When in the jury room the jury is the law. Jury nullification or conviction are the options, no majority vote needed.
@@SharperChainImported2mo ago
Jesus effing christ people, shes already in the damn chair. Just add the wires and a switch.
@@SawGerrera15Imported2mo ago
Women should no longer be allowed on a jury.
@@CheesesCrust13Imported2mo ago
We don't know where they sit exactly. Hopefully most are on the side of guilty. Which charge doesn't matter as long as it's not NGRI. I'll accept manslaughter if needed that's still many years behind bars.
@@KillFreeSpeechImported2mo ago
I wish her husband would've killed the kids so this would go away
@@bradleysplayhouse7856Imported2mo ago
What disgusting women that must be on the jury for it to take this long
@@johnnybgoode8104Imported2mo ago
The women on the jury are trying to let her off
@@EDUARDO-bj9wfImported2mo ago
Justice is failing one more time 😮
@@THEGlassIEDImported2mo ago
Reasonable doubt is subjective. Juries will always be fallible.
The Judge at the Lindsay Clancy trial sent the jurors back into deliberation after repeating instructions that the jurors must abide by reasonable doubt laws.
Share
Judge instructs jury on reasonable doubt, sends them back to deliberate
Asha Patel • 4.9K views
Share via
Or copy link
Embed
Report video
Reporting your own copyrighted work? Rights holders: please use the DMCA takedown form — it goes straight to our copyright agent.
Send a thanks
Support the creator with a one-time donation.
Choose an amount — you'll continue to secure checkout to complete your Thanks.