Did the Saxony-Anhalt results surprise you? | DW News - Vidnexa Skip to main content
Create Account
VidNexa
Up next
 
00:00 / 00:00
QualityAutochevron_right
Playback speedchevron_right
Audio trackchevron_right
Chapterschevron_right
Autoplay On
Loop Off
Sticky player Off
Sleep timerOffchevron_right
Subtitles/CC On
Captionschevron_right
Keyboard shortcuts ?
Stats for nerds
Sleep timer ended
⏪ 10s
⏩ 10s

Did the Saxony-Anhalt results surprise you? | DW News

1.1K views • 1 month ago
6 Comments
@markanderson980
@@markanderson9801 months ago
I like the red flag analogy
@Blabla0124
@@Blabla01241 months ago
Surprise? Are you trying to tell me anyone is surprised? Really? <br><br>Wir sind das Volk. Dont forget.
@julianshepherd2038
I can&#39;t believe the Germans would turn on the outsiders when something goes wrong.<br>Said no one.
@devo2
@@devo21 months ago
Maybe during the last election, don&#39;t tell all the people your 3 key points are less immigration, less working with EU and being open to work with any party.<br><br>To then the moment the vote booth&#39;s close instantly switch 180 on that, saying you are going to more work with EU, help immigration and never work with the AfD.<br><br>That you said all those things to take half the votes of the right. Well you succeeded.. CDU lost half and the right gained it all.
@joeybru
@@joeybru1 months ago
The whole political class bears responsibility for losing peoples trust, perhaps because of not being able to be decisive even when needed.
@UpMyButt
@@UpMyButt1 months ago
I keep hearing people celebrate the fact that voter turnout was over 80% and say that the AfD “mobilized voters.” But high turnout is not automatically a democratic success story.<br><br>Turnout tells us that more people voted, not whether democracy became stronger or healthier as a result. And it is a technical term in research not praise.<br><br>If a party that is deeply critical of defining elements of liberal democracy benefit from that mobilization, I don’t think we should frame that as something positive. What matters isn’t just how many people participate, but what that participation ultimately means for the democratic system.